Objections to the exemption of low value shipments from the Section 301 duties on goods from China demonstrates the need for a change in law to allow for de minimis exemptions for goods withdrawn from foreign-trade zones, the 321 Coalition said in comments to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. The comments were part of the docket on the fourth tranche of Section 301 tariffs on goods from China, which are now on hold as the U.S. and China work toward a trade deal (see 1907010012). The coalition similarly said it would like to see federal law changed to allow for de minimis entry for goods from foreign-trade zones as part of CBP's customs framework review (see 1902140022).
Section 301 (too broad)
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for June 24-28 in case they were missed.
CBP's Office of Regulations and Rulings is facing a massive increase in ruling requests involving products from China, in addition to its need to weigh in on exclusion requests, CBP Assistant Commissioner Brenda Smith said June 28 at the American Association of Exporters and Importers Annual Conference in Washington. The trade remedy exclusion requests are reviewed by OR&R "because of the tariff classification inherent in the application and then in the final determination," she said. Exclusion requests for the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum are now at about 80,000, well above the 10,000 that were expected when first announced, she said. That's not counting the exclusion request processes now available for the first three tranches of Section 301 tariffs on goods from China, she said.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative will open its new portal on June 30 at noon for exclusion requests for the third tranche of Section 301 tariffs (see 1906200002), as announced in a June 24 notice. The agency also posted a set of Frequently Asked Questions about the exclusion process, supplementing the recently added site meant to help importers navigate the Section 301 tariff process (see 1906190002).
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related matters:
While the reasons that Section 301 tariff exclusions were granted are murky to trade lawyers, in general, more information is better when submitting requests, trade lawyers said during a panel at the American Association of Exporters and Importers Annual Conference June 28. Pictures of your product, emails from domestic companies saying they can't provide the quantity you're looking for, and the number of U.S. jobs that are imperiled if you have to pay 25 percent more for this product are all good pieces of information to provide, they said.
CBP has assessed about $27.8 billion in duties under the major trade remedies started during the Trump administration as of June 19, according to CBP's trade statistics page. That includes $19.3 billion in duties from the Section 301 tariffs on goods from China. The first tranche of Section 301 tariffs took effect on July 6, 2018 (see 1807050033); the second took effect on Aug. 23, 2018 (see 1808070046); and the third, on Sept. 24, 2018 (see 1809240015). CBP also has assessed about $5.8 billion under the Section 232 tariffs on steel and $1.8 billion under tariffs on aluminum. The Section 201 trade remedies on washing machines and solar cells (see 1801230052), imposed Jan. 23, 2018, account for $857.7 million in assessed tariffs.
Rep. Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., introduced a bill, the Reclaiming Congressional Trade Authority Act of 2019, that would require that any tariffs implemented on national security grounds -- whether through Section 232 or another mechanism, such as the national emergency on immigration -- be approved by Congress. The bill, introduced June 25, would allow tariffs to be in place for 120 days without congressional approval. It has a Senate companion bill, S. 899, introduced by Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., and Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va.
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for June 17-21 in case they were missed.
House Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee Chairman Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., said after a June 25 hearing on Mexican labor reform that the Democrats asking for changes to the NAFTA rewrite are asking for changes that are "relatively narrow." "Our hope is we can move with dispatch, get our concerns resolved, strengthen the agreement and move forward," he said, adding that trade deal votes "never get easy, putting them off."