It might be safest to let Alaska USF die, said Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) Common Carrier Specialist David Parrish at virtual technical conference Friday. Alaska’s public advocate and telecom industry officials disagreed. AUSF, set to sunset mid-2023, "has been really hobbling along for years," said Parrish: If the commission wants to continue the fund, RCA staff thinks the “only equitable solution” is its proposal to target AUSF support to areas where voice remains the primary form of telecom (see 2203140056), especially because much federal infrastructure money is coming and since pursuing state USF reform could increase the likelihood the RCA is sued, Parrish said. Just because it’s easiest to let AUSF die “doesn't mean it's the right thing to do,” responded Alaska Chief Assistant Attorney General Jeff Waller of the Regulatory Affairs & Public Advocacy division. The Matanuska Telephone Association also disagreed with killing AUSF. "This is not the time for AUSF to go away," said MTA counsel Dean Thompson of Kemppel Huffman. "What do you do about access charges?" It would leave "a big hole of lawfully recovered rate recovery,” he said. MTA had submitted an alternative proposal to switch to connections-based contribution. Alaska Communications sees a remaining need for AUSF, said Manager-Regulatory Affairs Lisa Phillips. GCI Senior Director-Regulatory Affairs Juliana Wayman cautioned the RCA that coming federal funding will do nothing for ongoing operating costs.
California stepped toward regulating VoIP, broadband and wireless service quality. The California Public Utilities Commission voted 5-0 at a virtual meeting Thursday to open a rulemaking sought by consumer advocates to update telecom service-quality standards and enforcement. The Voice on the Net (VON) Coalition warned that states are preempted from regulating interconnected VoIP.
Industry disagreed whether the FCC should pause some of its high-cost Universal Service Fund programs amid the recent $65 billion federal broadband support from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, in reply comments posted Friday in docket 21-476 (see 2202180046). Others debated whether to expand the fund's contribution base or turn to direct congressional appropriations. The FCC sought comments on USF's future as part of its report to Congress due by Aug. 12.
The FCC’s “top-to-bottom” review of communications companies’ ties to Russia, announced by Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel Wednesday (see 2203160031), likely has a broad focus, covering media companies, telecom and infrastructure providers, submarine cable operators and any Russian companies carrying U.S.-international phone traffic, industry experts told us. But compared with China, a recurring focus of the FCC, ties to Russia appear to be minimal.
House Communications Subcommittee members are continuing to wrestle with whether and how to package legislation to reauthorize the FCC’s spectrum auction authority with other related policy matters. Witnesses at a Wednesday hearing on those issues urged Congress to quickly renew the FCC’s sales authority and cited a range of other matters lawmakers should simultaneously consider, including directing proceeds to pay for other telecom projects and addressing interagency disputes on frequency allocations (see 2203150069).
A West Virginia Senate panel considered but decided against removing mapping requirements from a bill meant to increase state control of broadband deployment as federal dollars roll in. At a livestreamed Wednesday meeting, the Economic Development Committee unanimously approved the House-passed HB-4001, sending the bill to the Finance Committee. Sen. Eric Tarr (R) proposed amendments, including to remove requirements to map poles and right-of-way disturbances, after Economic Development Department officials testified they could cost $2 million and would duplicate existing work. Tarr said he was wary of "potentially creating some overregulation that could decrease the speed of deployment” and add unnecessary cost. But Tarr withdrew his amendment after HB-4001 sponsor Del. Daniel Linville (R), showed up late to the meeting to defend his bill. Linville said a recent Facebook fiber project in West Virginia faced hurdles because the National Historic Preservation Act required proof of prior disturbance. Mapping disturbances could expedite future projects, he said. Mapping poles would reduce cost and hassle while speeding deployment because the maps would provide ready information on poles’ ability to support attachments, he said. Tarr also proposed and withdrew an amendment to remove the attorney general from the bill, which would leave the West Virginia Public Service Commission in charge. PSC Chairman Charlotte Lane said the commission was well-equipped to handle all parts of the bill that currently includes both the AG and PSC. But Linville said the AG receives many consumer complaints and in 2015 reached a $160 million settlement with Frontier Communications (see 1512100036).
The FCC must be the decider in spectrum disputes, which was Congress’ intention when it approved the Communication Act in 1934, said Public Knowledge and the Digital Progress Institute in a paper released Wednesday. The paper notes the Commerce Department initially had authority to assign commercial spectrum licenses, but that duty was assigned to the Federal Radio Commission in 1927, and later the FCC. “Congress realized early on that giving an executive agency -- like the Department of Commerce -- the authority to regulate spectrum would create a massive conflict of interest in resolving spectrum disputes,” the paper said: “The reason is that the Executive Branch is a significant user of spectrum, and it would be difficult for a cabinet Secretary to be impartial when deciding either to grant a license to a commercial carrier or another executive agency.” Congress gave the FCC “a lot of tools to manage spectrum, as compared to the NTIA or any other agency,” the groups said: “Congress gave almost exclusive jurisdiction to the FCC to determine how commercial operators can use spectrum. … Congress had many opportunities to provide the NTIA with more spectrum allocation authority, but it did not.” The paper follows several disputes between the FCC and other agencies, most recently with the FAA over use of the C band for 5G.
NTCA Director-Government Affairs Adam Jorde says he’s moving to Twilio as lead-government affairs, communications policy … State Senate confirms Ann Rendahl as commissioner-Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission for second six-year term ending Jan. 1, 2027 …Intelsat names Raytheon’s David Wajsgras as its next CEO, effective April 4, succeeding Stephen Spengler, who announced his planned retirement in October ... Analog Devices taps Intel’s Gregory Bryant for newly created roles as executive vice president and president-business units, effective March 14, with oversight for industrial, automotive, communications, digital healthcare and consumer segments.
The FCC needs to stand strong as its decisions reallocating spectrum bands remain “under attack” from other federal agencies, Commissioner Brendan Carr said at an event Thursday, sponsored by CTA and WifiForward. The challenge isn’t new in the Joe Biden administration, he said. The Communications Act makes clear that the FCC should decide how spectrum is allocated, he said. “As spectrum becomes more important, as connectivity becomes more important” other agencies are “effectively trying to challenge that 1930s congressional decision that experts at the FCC should call the balls and strikes here,” he said. Carr sees artificial and virtual reality, and the need for spectrum to connect AR/VR goggles to the internet, as key drivers of continuing demand for Wi-Fi. “At the FCC, we’ve tried to do our part to make sure there is plenty of” unlicensed “spectrum out there,” he said: “We’ve got to continue to stay strong” and “push back against efforts to encroach on the FCC’s expertise.” Reps. Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., and Bob Latta, R-Ohio, chairs of the Congressional Wi-Fi Caucus, said the FCC has done a good job making more spectrum available for Wi-Fi and that push needs to continue. “The value of unlicensed spectrum is absolutely undeniable,” McNerney said. Opening the 5.9 and 6 GHz bands for unlicensed was critical, he said. “We can’t rest there,” he said. We have to continue to push the commission to open up more portions of the spectrum for unlicensed use, and that will continue to push innovation,” he said. “What would have happened” without unlicensed spectrum during the COVID-19 pandemic, Latta asked. “Tele-education, telework, just people staying in touch with their loved ones, those are the things that we came to rely on,” he said. “Think where we were 10 years ago, and then five years ago” and where we are today, he said: “We have a great reliance on unlicensed technology. … It’s a necessity now.” The U.S. doesn’t want to follow other countries, “we want to be the leaders,” he said. “Unlicensed spectrum supports a wide range of innovations, from drones and [VR] headsets, to mobile payments and wearables,” said David Grossman, CTA vice president-regulatory affairs.
Communications industry companies, law firms and government agencies are looking at returning to the office, with the COVID-19 omicron variant on the wane. The shift coincides with Washington, D.C., dropping its mask mandate and the White House urging companies and agencies to return to work. “COVID-19 no longer needs to dictate how we work,” said a White House COVID-19 Preparedness Plan released Wednesday.