California could make jail and prison calls free under a bill cleared Tuesday by the Assembly Public Safety Committee. San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto disagreed with other county sheriff departments that opposed SB-1008. Meanwhile, at a Senate hearing, ISP associations and Republicans opposed a bill to restrict state contracts only to ISPs that offer affordable internet services.
Top members of the House and Senate Commerce committees are having varying levels of success in moving forward in the coming weeks on spectrum legislation. The House Communications Subcommittee plans to mark up a revised version of the Extending America’s Spectrum Auction Leadership Act (HR-7783) Wednesday along with other legislation, subpanel Chairman Mike Doyle, D-Pa., said in an interview. Senate Commerce leaders, meanwhile, told us they're still grappling with how to move forward on the Improving Spectrum Coordination Act (S-1472) after an amendment fight prompted them to remove it from a markup last month (see 2205250063).
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission should consider revoking LTD Broadband’s eligible telecom carrier (ETC) designation, said the state Commerce Department in Wednesday reply comments in docket M-21-133. ETC designation is needed for Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) support. Minnesota Commerce, which didn’t make a recommendation in initial comments last week (see 2206020046), said now that the “collective concerns raised by the petitioners, rural organizations, counties, and townships … provide compelling reasons for the Commission to open an investigation.” The PUC should launch an expedited proceeding that includes discovery and cross-examination of expert witnesses, the department said. The Minnesota attorney general’s office said it continues to recommend a proceeding. LTD disagreed, saying "It would be unfair, and violate the principle of competitive neutrality, if the expanded ETC designation granted to [LTD] last year is singled out for re-examination or revocation when other Minnesota RDOF ETCs, who made the same commitments as LTD, are not subject to the same scrutiny.” Any compliance or oversight requirements “should apply to all ETCs” and should be addressed in the PUC’s docket CI-21-86 on ETC designation authority “on a timeline and in a manner that does not jeopardize LTD’s eligibility for RDOF funding,” it said. Initial comments showed widespread, deep concerns, which are "fully justified,” replied the Minnesota Telecom Alliance and Minnesota Rural Electric Association, which originally asked for the proceeding. “Unless LTD delivers on its promises, over 160,000 Minnesota residents could be denied the benefit of federal support for broadband deployment." Chippewa County wants an expedited proceeding because it has been unable to communicate with LTD Broadband and "its residents have lost faith” that LTD can fulfill its promises, the county said. "The RDOF Award and LTD's ETC designation puts Chippewa County at a significant disadvantage for economic growth and vitality."
Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Roger Wicker of Mississippi and other panel Republicans criticized NTIA’s plans for rolling out its $48 billion share of broadband money from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act during a Thursday hearing with agency Administrator Alan Davidson, as expected (see 2206020070). Senate Communications Subcommittee Chairman Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico and other panel Democrats delivered more positive, but not universally complimentary, reviews of NTIA’s work. There was significantly less focus on the agency’s government spectrum coordination role.
Minnesota’s attorney general supported revisiting LTD Broadband’s eligible telecom carrier (ETC) designation. So did some local governments and consumer and municipal broadband advocates, in comments due Wednesday in docket M-21-133 at the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. LTD urged the PUC to reject the request by Minnesota Telecom Alliance (MTA) and Minnesota Rural Electric Association (MREA) to revoke the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) winner’s ETC status (see 2205170058).
The Supreme Court’s slim margin blocking Texas from enforcing a social media law surprised some court watchers. The action via a 5-4 emergency ruling Tuesday in NetChoice v. Paxton barred the law from being enforced while under consideration by the lower courts. Questions remain about where justices would stand in a case on the law’s merits, with Tuesday’s opinion shedding light only on three dissenting members’ views, said observers in interviews.
The California Public Utilities Commission will accept applications for various broadband funding programs starting in the next two months, said Commissioner Darcie Houck at a partially virtual California Broadband Council meeting Wednesday. The CPUC expects to accept grant applications for California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) adoption, consortiums and housing accounts and the $50 million Local Agency Technical Assistance program in June or July, said Houck. The CPUC expects to accept proposals for the $2 billion last-mile federal funding account in July, she said. The agency aims to release a straw proposal for the $750 million Loan Loss Reserve Fund in August, with comments and workshops to follow, the commissioner said. The CPUC plans to release a proposal to update CASF infrastructure account rules by the end of Q2 this year, she said. Houck is “very aware” $2 billion won’t be enough for the last-mile program but hopes the state will soon get much more from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, she said. The CPUC is developing a framework to define essential broadband service affordability standards, said Communications Division Director Rob Osborn: Expect a proposed decision coming in June or July. More granular broadband data, based on location rather than census block, is due June 1 and the commission hopes to publish it by year-end, he said. California’s State Transportation Agency and Transportation Department (CalTrans) aim by Dec. 31 to complete a dig smart policy that would allow for collocation of underground conduits, said CalTrans Broadband Coordinator Elizabeth Dooher.
Disability rights advocates and digital navigators on Wednesday urged the FCC to emphasize accessibility in its forthcoming consumer broadband labels. Several panelists at the commission’s third public hearing on the labels highlighted the need for multiple languages and alternative formats for individuals who may not understand technical language (see 2204080027).
House Communications Subcommittee members voiced strong support during a Tuesday hearing for the Extending America’s Spectrum Auction Leadership Act (HR-7783) and two NTIA-focused spectrum bills, echoing expected backing from Wiley’s Anna Gomez and CommScope Business Development and Spectrum Policy Director Mark Gibson (see 2205230061). Lawmakers broadly supported elements of the Safe Connections Act (HR-7132), but opinions on the Ensuring Phone and Internet Access for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients Act (HR-4275) divided along party lines.
Don’t try to expand state authority to VoIP and wireless, industry warned the Iowa Utilities Board in Friday comments in docket NOI-2021-0002. IUB Chair Geri Huser said in December the agency plans to finalize a draft bill on telecom statutory changes for the 2023 legislative session, while pushing back on industry concerns the state commission is angling to expand its telecom authority at a December meeting (see 2112130049). A revised draft released last week fails to address industry concerns, commented Lumen, warning the IUB to expect opposition. One problematic section may allow the IUB to determine a service is an essential communication service and broadly regulate it, Lumen said. Another part includes VoIP as a telecom service that the board can regulate, despite the 8th U.S. Circuit of Appeals finding VoIP is an information service, it said. And Lumen raised concerns with the draft possibly allowing investigations into whether an interexchange carrier is providing any service in a nondiscriminatory fashion. "Lumen is not aware of a nondiscrimination requirement associated with broadband services, and any attempt to regulate service quality of broadband services would face an inevitable court challenge.” Proposed complaint rules may exceed IUB jurisdiction, said CTIA: Mandatory administrative assessments "would disproportionately burden wireless providers." The draft could “subject VoIP and wireless to regulation by the IUB in a manner that is preempted by federal law,” warned AT&T, which also cited the 8th Circuit. “Wireless services have been deregulated in Iowa since 1986, and VoIP has never been regulated in Iowa.” Keep that deregulation going, agreed Verizon. "As there does not appear to be any evidence that the statute and rules are not working as currently written and with no deadline mandate, we ask that the Board take the time and careful consideration necessary to work through the implications of these sweeping changes.” The Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities also opposed the board expanding regulatory authority. The IUB plans a workshop on the matter Thursday at 8 a.m. CDT.