Sen. Burns (Mont.), ranking Republican on Senate Commerce Communications Subcommittee, asked FCC Chmn. Powell to provide information on ultra wideband (UWB) testing under way at Commission. Agency earlier this year approved UWB order that provided technical requirements allowing commercial technology to move forward, but indicated at time that it would conduct testing over next year to evaluate what if any changes should be made in restrictions on UWB. “The results of these Commission tests could form the basis for the review and possible relaxation of the rules adopted in the first report and order,” Burns said. Burns said he wanted FCC to provide information by Aug. 31 on these questions: (1) Will FCC “publish and invite public comment” on test plan it intends to pursue in evaluating UWB interference into other services. If so, Burns said he wanted to know whether that information would be provided before testing began. (2) “In developing and implementing its test plans, will the Commission consider worst-case scenarios, especially in reviewing potential UWB interference into safety of life frequency bands and services?” Burns said if FCC didn’t plan that, he would like outline of scenarios that Commission would consider and “how they account for the grave consequences interference to safety of life systems could have.” (3) Will FCC use range of UWB device and network prototypes in testing. (4) What group in FCC will undertake tests and analyze data. Burns asked specifically whether other federal agencies would be involved in developing test plans and whether FCC would seek public comment on test data before it considered further notice. (5) Will Commission use test data for purposes other than developing further notice, such as responding to pending petitions for reconsideration.
FCC denied petition by 2 groups of local telcos that sought additional regulation of Western Wireless service in Kan. State Independent Alliance and Independent Telecom Group asked FCC in Nov. 2000 for declaratory ruling that Western Wireless’ Basic Universal Service (BUS) wasn’t commercial mobile radio service (CMRS). Such ruling would have meant Kan. Corp. Commission (KCC) wasn’t precluded by federal law from applying wireline LEC regulations to BUS. FCC, with Comr. Martin dissenting, concluded BUS was CMRS offering, so KCC couldn’t regulate BUS entry or rates and couldn’t require it to provide equal access for telephone toll services. Mark Rubin, Western Wireless federal govt. affairs dir., said company was “grateful that the FCC saw the petition for what it was -- a bold end-around the Communications Act’s prohibition against state or local governments’ regulating the entry of or the rates charged by a CMRS provider.” Issue is part of continual debate in states over how to classify Western Wireless’ wireless local loop service. Martin said he found it “difficult to believe this… offering, which is designed specifically to qualify for universal service subsidies, should be deemed exempt from regulations and universal service fund requirements applicable to wireline local exchange carriers providing essentially the same service.”
FCC Chmn. Powell told Senate Commerce Committee that it needed to expand scope of Sec. 214 of Communications Act for Commission to ensure continuity of variety of telecom services. Powell made comments in committee hearing Tues. on financial turmoil in telecom industry that also featured high-level officers of Global Crossing, Qwest and WorldCom. Committee Chmn. Hollings (D-S.C.) agreed Congress should broaden scope of Act’s section that gave FCC power to prevent communications networks from cutting service as result of bankruptcy and said he would try to make legislative changes before Congress’s adjournment scheduled for first week of Oct. Hollings asked Powell to send recommendations to Committee. Powell wouldn’t elaborate on how broad Sec. 214 scope should be, although he did mention cable companies and Internet service providers. He said there often was conflict between bankruptcy law and Commission’s powers under Sec. 214. Although he said he could envision scenario where scope of Sec. 214 could hamper FCC efforts to prevent loss of service, there were no current bankruptcies where agency didn’t have power to act.
Telecom bills advanced in Cal., N.C., Del., N.Y. and Mass. In Cal., Gov. Gray Davis (D) signed bill requiring all telecom service providers to conduct background checks on prospective employees to determine whether they posed threat to security of carriers’ networks. Under AB-1934, background check requirement applies not only to direct hires by carriers but also to contractors, vendors and their employees who have access to or contact with network equipment or customer premises. N.C. Gov. Mike Easley (D) signed bill to make Internet access service eligible for state universal service support. Measure (SB-641) also directs N.C. Utilities Commission to consider future evolution of telecom when considering what services should be eligible for universal service subsidies. Easley also signed HB-1521, which conforms state’s wireless taxation laws to federal Mobile Telecom Sourcing Act by making wireless services taxable at subscriber’s place of primary use, typically home or workplace, regardless of where call actually occurred. Del. Gov. Ruthann Miner (D) signed similar wireless taxation bill to conform Del. law to federal act (HB-492). N.Y. Gov. George Pataki (R) signed 2 telecom bills. First (SB-5027) allows state to extend right-of-way leases along N.Y. Thruway to 30 years. Previously, leases could run only 20 years. Second (SB-1607) directs Dept. of Public Service to study telecom services available to rural residents and make recommendations for legislation by Feb. 1. Study will look at whether status of communications systems is hindering small towns’ ability to attract and retain businesses. N.Y. legislature passed bill (SB-5207) to quintuple maximum fine for slamming. Under bill sent to Pataki, maximum fine would rise to $5,000 per slam, up from current $1,000. Measure would take effect 60 days after enactment. Legislature also passed AB-11669, which would authorize Nassau County to implement wireless E911 surcharge of up to 90 cents monthly on mobile phones of persons who live or work in county. Measure sent to Pataki would authorize fee but would requires the N.Y.C. suburb to pass its own enabling ordinance to put charge into effect. Mass. legislature passed bill (SB-2349) that would allow municipalities to modify telephone company equipment used for 911 service so their fire depts. could monitor 911 emergency calls. Under bill sent to Gov. Jane Swift (R), monitoring would be done only by trained fire dept. personnel at secure location. Another Mass. telecom bill, to create state no-call list (HB-5225), passed House and was sent to Senate. Bill would authorize state attorney gen. to maintain and enforce list and would set $5,000 fine per offending call. Victims would be able to file civil suits for damages. Mass. bill to extend contractor licensing to include telecom installers passed Senate Way & Means Committee. Bill (SB-2375) would require that telecom installers who perform work on commercial properties obtain state license by demonstrating competence before they could perform work on commercial properties. Requirement is similar to that imposed on electricians and alarm installers.
Bush Administration Tues. released long-awaited 3G viability assessment under which Defense Dept. agreed to clear most of 1710-1755 MHz but said freeing additional 15 MHz beyond that was untenable between now and 2008. Result is that report finds way to clear 90 MHz of spectrum for advanced wireless services at 1.7 GHz and in 45 MHz of 2110- 2170 MHz, which is occupied by nongovt. users. That’s less than 120 MHz that NTIA and other Executive Branch agencies had left on table last fall for 3G evaluation, after taking 1770-1850 MHz occupied by DoD out of consideration following Sept. 11 attacks (CD Oct 9 p3). While spectrum is less than originally sought by industry, private sector and govt. officials at Commerce Dept. briefing touted outcome as providing certainty that allocation decisions and auction could be held in 2004-2005 time frame. Also Tues., Commerce Dept. released draft bill to create spectrum relocation fund to pay incumbent govt. users for relocating and modernizing equipment. Commerce Secy. Donald Evans said 3G assessment strikes “a necessary balance between our country’s economic growth and national security, as well as public safety.”
WorldCom made largest Chapter 11 filing in U.S. history late Sun., leading FCC Chmn. Powell to issue statement providing reassurances that his agency didn’t believe action would “lead to an immediate disruption of service to consumers or threaten the operation of WorldCom’s Internet backbone facilities.” FCC Deputy Gen. Counsel John Rogovin filed appearance Mon. at U.S. Bankruptcy Court, N.Y., action characterized by spokeswoman as assuring that Commission was official party in proceeding. She said Rogovin’s role would be to make judge aware, during bankruptcy proceeding, of importance of continued service to customers, including federal govt., and need to protect universal service funding, wireless licenses and Internet. Justice Dept. (DoJ) also took action, filing motion requesting independent examiner be appointed to investigate company’s financial affairs.
Short-message service (SMS) developer Target Wireless filed petition with Federal Election Commission asking for exemption from disclosure requirement for federal candidates who use text messaging over wireless phones to pitch their campaigns. Target Wireless said FEC was expected to take up its petition, which would apply to congressional and presidential candidates, Aug. 15. Because maximum character capacity for each SMS text message sent to digital phones can’t exceed 160 characters, petition said that fine print of current federal disclosure requirements, which include who is paying for message, would take up all the available message space and leave no room for candidate’s main message. Target Wireless Pres. Craig Krueger said such messages would be made available only on “opt-in” basis so that wireless subscribers wouldn’t be spammed by unwanted political ads. He told us that presidential candidate in 2000 had expressed interest in using SMS as advertising tool but viewed disclosure requirements as making that medium impractical. He declined to disclose which presidential hopeful had explored this possibility, although he said it was one of 2 major party candidates. Company is relying on precedent of FEC’s already having granted exceptions to disclosure requirements on ground of limited space for bumper stickers, skywriting, water towers and novelty items such as pens and pencils. Point of petition is to allow candidates to “leverage new communications vehicles to promote their candidate,” Krueger said. Company petitioned FEC in May for advisory petition concerning exemption request for SMS messages on digital phones. Target Wireless told FEC that it has standing to make request because it plans activities starting in 2002 to deliver political messages to “hard-to-reach mobile audience.” FEC filing outlined potential activities that included Target acting as broker of wireless ads between political parties or candidates and content providers such as broadcasters like CNN and Fox. Under this scenario, Target said it would receive commission for placing wireless ad. Another possibility would be Target acting as broker between content provider and wireless networks to facilitate relationship between candidates and content providers, company told FEC. In such cases, Target said it could broker arrangement between content provider and wireless carrier. Another possibility raised by company is that it would be agent for candidates seeking federal office. “Target Wireless has had discussions with political candidates about wireless advertising, but has been unable to proceed further because of the uncertainty of the application of the FEC’s disclaimer exemption to such communications,” filing said. Target Wireless’s petition to FEC argued: “Because wireless devices can receive and communicate messages to a massive mobile audience with consistent regularity, wireless can be used … as an advertising tool that is capable of reaching a unique, mobile audience for which traditional cable and modem-based applications are not well-suited to deliver.”
Mo. Gov. Bob Holden (D) signed 2 telecom bills. First is SB-795, which authorizes St. Louis County to levy special tax on real estate to support establishment, operation and maintenance of emergency telecom system for police, fire and rescue units. Funds will be placed in special account to be administered by city Emergency Communications System Commission. Holden also signed HB-1890, which amends state wireless taxation laws to conform to federal Mobile Telecom Sourcing Act. Measure makes wireless services taxable at customer’s place of primary use, typically home or workplace, regardless of where call actually is placed.
Wash. state regulators refused to reconsider their July 1 decision to endorse Qwest’s Sec. 271 bid for interLATA long distance entry. Wash. Utilities & Transportation Commission denied petitions for reconsideration filed by AT&T and Covad Communications. Carriers wanted WUTC to reconsider its support in light of criminal investigation into Qwest business conduct by U.S. Attorney and 2nd probe by House Energy & Commerce Committee. They contended pending criminal probe, congressional investigation plus charges that Qwest made secret deals with its competitors to remove their opposition to its regulatory initiatives all were highly relevant to company’s compliance with Telecom Act. WUTC disagreed, saying federal investigations into Qwest corporate and financial practices weren’t relevant to central Telecom Act question whether Qwest’s local markets were fully and irreversibly open to competition. WUTC said it wasn’t persuaded that unfiled Qwest-CLEC agreements in Wash. affected openness of Qwest’s local markets. AT&T had planned similar reconsideration petitions in Mont., Utah and Wyo., whose votes last week to support Qwest prompted carrier to file its July 12 applications at FCC. But AT&T said it had changed its plans and would take its concerns directly to FCC.
State regulators Wed. reiterated their position that they be free to modify any FCC national list of unbundled network elements (UNEs) that incumbent telcos must offer to their competitors. In teleconference with reporters, several regulators also called for establishment of federal-state joint conference on UNEs to ensure FCC and states didn’t start working at cross purposes. Wed. was deadline for reply comments in FCC’s triennial UNE review. In comments filed late in day, consumer groups and CLECs also urged Commission not to reduce number of mandatory national UNEs or allow any new restrictions on UNE availability. ILECs on other hand, said it was clear that UNEs weren’t as vital as they once were.