Verizon Wireless asked U.S. Appeals Court, D.C., this week to establish expedited schedule for hearing its challenge to March 27 FCC order that returned 85% of NextWave re-auction deposits. Verizon told court that FCC didn’t oppose expedited schedule for briefing and arguments. Earlier this month, Verizon Wireless filed suit in U.S. Court of Federal Claims to obtain remaining deposit from re-auction and seek ruling that auction “contract” for disputed licenses was void (CD April 9 p1). Separate challenge also was filed at D.C. Circuit over Commission order. Last month, FCC returned 85% of deposits to re-auction winners but concluded winning bidders should continue for now to be held to nearly $16 billion auction obligations until Supreme Court review is finalized (CD March 28 p1). Verizon Wireless told D.C. Circuit that agency refused to return all of carrier’s down payment and kept it obligated to pay “on 10 days’ notice” $8.4 billion for licenses if Commission eventually reacquires them. Filing said: “The order is wrong under fundamental principles of contract law, and it irreparably injures Verizon Wireless.” Carrier told court that “the Commission’s assertion that Verizon Wireless remains on the hook to pay this enormous sum on short notice has led 2 major credit- rating agencies to revise from ’stable’ to ‘negative’ their credit outlook for Verizon Communications.” Credit rating agencies attribute Verizon Wireless’s debt to Verizon, which co-owns Verizon Wireless in joint venture with Vodafone. Verizon Wireless told court that its agreement to participate in re-auction of NextWave licenses meant it took on risk that it might have to surrender licenses if D.C. Circuit issued ruling that returned them to NextWave, which occurred in June and is now being appealed to Supreme Court by FCC. But Verizon Wireless said it “did not accept the risks that the FCC now seeks to impose on it -- that if this court’s decision in the pending litigation made the licenses unavailable, the FCC would nonetheless compel Verizon Wireless for years to bear a contingent liability to pay more than $8 billion on 10 days’ notice if and when the FCC succeeds in reclaiming the licenses.” Verizon said it didn’t accept risk that it would bear such burdens “for an indefinite period without any assurance that it would ever receive the licenses that it won at auction.” Briefing schedule proposed by Verizon Wireless would set June 10 deadline for it to file brief and July 24 date for FCC. Final briefs would be due Aug. 30.
National Communications System (NCS) approved contract award to VoiceStream Wireless to provide priority access service for Washington and N.Y. metro areas. Approval had been expected since FCC granted VoiceStream temporary waiver earlier this month of its wireless priority access service (PAS) rules for GSM-based system that will provide national security and emergency personnel (NS/EP) access to wireless networks during emergencies. VoiceStream said it expected PAS system to be operational within 60 days. DynCorp, systems integration contractor for NCS’s wireline Govt. Emergency Telecom Service (GETS), awarded contract to VoiceStream. Carrier said agreement allowed its handsets to be provided by govt. to NS/EP users at federal, state and local level. Percentage of NS/EP users on wireless network compared with network’s customer base is expected to be less than 0.1%, VoiceStream said. It hasn’t attached dollar figure to contract, to which 5,000 users will have access in both cities on subscription basis, spokeswoman said. NCS Deputy Mgr. Brent Greene said agency would continue to work with VoiceStream and other wireless carriers toward national solution to wireless NS/EP communications by end of year. He said system would “enable us to balance national security and emergency preparedness needs while minimizing the impact on consumer access to the same wireless infrastructures.” FCC in 2000 issued rules on how NS/EP users could gain access in emergencies to next available wireless channel to originate call without preempting calls already in progress. Commission didn’t require carriers to provide PAS but created uniform operating protocols.
Deputy Defense Secy. Paul Wolfowitz told Commerce Dept. (DoC) in letter on ultra-wideband that he was confident FCC now understood Commerce had authority over whether new technology radiating into govt. bands met statutory public interest obligations. In letter to Secy. Donald Evans, Wolfowitz stressed role of Executive Branch agencies in managing spectrum in way that protected federal systems. FCC approved UWB order Feb. 14 after long coordination process with NTIA amid concerns by agencies such as DoD and Transportation Dept. on how GPS and other safety-of-life systems would be protected from interference.
After “sleepless night,” CEA Pres. Gary Shapiro said he would begin meeting with CEA members on possibility of compromise on FCC Chmn. Powell’s DTV plan. CEA had indicated DTV tuner portion of plan would be unacceptable because of cost of adding tuners to low-priced TVs. However, Shapiro, in Mon. keynote at MSTV meeting during NAB convention in Las Vegas, indicated CEA was caught partly by surprise by Powell announcement and might have to “modify our initial reaction a bit.” Shapiro wouldn’t discuss possible shape of compromise, saying only that he would discuss issue with members and “see what we can do.” He told us later some members might find including tuner easier than others: “There is some room for discussion.” There were other indications at convention that CEA might seek stronger commitment on cable compatibility issues in return for agreeing to some version of tuner plan, although timing of tuner adoption also remained issue. -- MF
LAS VEGAS -- If EchoStar acquisition of Hughes Electronics and its DirecTV affiliate is approved, it will be over opposition of several key members of Congress and would involve conditions, NAB attendees were told here at convention Mon. Strongest opposition to deal came from members of House and Senate Judiciary committees, which deal with antitrust issues, but there were concerns among Commerce Committee members as well. Hill leaders and their staffs in 2 separate functions also debated broadcast ownership caps, mandating political free time and DTV tuner standards, controversy over liquor ads.
Comments on FCC’s unbundled network element (UNE) regime poured into FCC late Fri., offering views from nearly every perspective. Bells asked agency to scale back on UNE sharing, CLECs warned of “irreparable” harm if that happened, Progress & Freedom Foundation said reform would encourage broadband investment, National Telecom Co-op Assn. (NTCA) urged FCC to consider impact on rural areas. Telecom industry considers UNE review one of most important regulatory actions under way at FCC because debate touches on CLEC competition, Bell company participation in broadband, other issues. Commission is considering whether current UNE list can be reduced and whether such reduction could be made on geographic or service-specific basis. UNE regime requires Bell companies to lease portions of their network to their competitors for prices that Bells say are far too low.
Federal Election Commission (FEC) rescheduled closed meeting in which agency will attempt to implement campaign finance reform bill recently signed by President Bush. Date was changed to 10 a.m. April 11 from April 10. FEC must revise regulations affected by new law that: (1) Restricts corporate and labor union expenditures for broadcast, cable and satellite “electioneering communications.” (2) Prevents broadcasters from offering lowest unit charge to buyers of ads mentioning political opponents. National Rifle Assn., Sen. McConnell (R-Ky.) and Rep. Barr (R-Ga.) separately filed suits in U.S. Dist. Court, D.C., challenging law’s constitutionality. NRA said an inadvertent consequence of law would be Internet regulation, since many online communications traveled via cable and satellite (CD March 28 p 7). Injunctions are sought against FEC, FCC and Dept. of Justice to block implementation and enforcement of law. Another item on agenda is review on audit report on 2000 Presidential campaign of Sen. McCain (R-Ariz.).
Industry and govt. spectrum users agreed on need for more regulatory certainty and flexibility in govt. spectrum policy at NTIA Spectrum Management & Policy Summit Thurs. But at start of 2-day summit, panels struggled with how to define spectrum property rights, incumbent relocation, global harmonization, incentives for efficient spectrum use, accurate forecasts of future demand. FCC Chmn. Powell and NTIA Dir. Nancy Victory stressed renewed commitment of both agencies to engage in regular spectrum planning meetings. While overarching govt. goal is to develop national spectrum policy and improve spectrum management policy, Victory said NTIA was in “listening mode” to assess what was and wasn’t working under current policies. “This is clearly a significant moment in spectrum management,” she said, noting spectrum review outcome could involve changing “slightly or drastically” way bands are managed. Much of day-long discussion focused on thorny transitional issues that face govt. policymakers in areas such as how incumbents are treated when more flexible spectrum policies like sharing and leasing are introduced. “Our challenge is this: How do we fit new world-leading technologies into the U.S.’s own cramped spectrum allocation,” Commerce Secy. Donald Evans said.
Debate over FCC’s triennial review of unbundled network elements (UNEs) continued Thurs. with several parties expressing concerns about effect on competition and USTA warning that UNE process stymied investment. Today (Fri.) is deadline for comments in proceeding on whether current UNE list can be reduced and whether such reduction could be made on geographic or service-specific basis. UNE regime requires Bell companies to lease portions of their network to their competitors.
CTIA asked FCC to again delay 700 MHz auction now scheduled for June 19, citing “numerous contradictions and many uncertainties” that surround process. “While a June auction might be called an ‘auction,’ in reality it would be the U.S. government opening a casino and collecting the ante for a much bigger private auction to enrich broadcasters at the expense of rational spectrum policy and the welfare of American taxpayers,” CTIA Pres. Tom Wheeler wrote to FCC Chmn. Powell. Last year, FCC Wireless Bureau postponed planned Sept. 12, 2001, auction of TV Ch. 60-69 spectrum now occupied by analog broadcasters for 5th time. CTIA’s request for delay came one day after Pax TV Chmn. Lowell Paxson told reporters that if there were another delay in 700 MHz auction, there would be no voluntary clearing of that spectrum by analog TV stations to make way for nonbroadcast users (CD April 3 p5). Request also came as Cingular Wireless was floating plan to ameliorate interference issues faced by public safety users at 800 MHZ that would move those licensees to 700 MHz, necessitate delay in auction and require congressionally mandated certainty as to when broadcasters would move. FCC officials have emphasized in recent weeks that Commission is preparing for auction of Chs. 52-59 and Chs. 60-69 at 700 MHz. FCC faces Sept. 2002 statutory deadline for depositing proceeds from Ch. 52-59 auction into U.S. Treasury. In 2000, congressional leaders signaled their support for Ch. 60-69 auction’s slipping beyond statutory deadline of Sept. 30, 2000, for depositing proceeds from auction of that band. CTIA argued in its petition that Congress had given agency conflicting instructions. It has directed FCC to auction Ch. 52-59 spectrum by Sept. 30, but that deadline conflicts with Sec. 309 of Communications Act, which directs Commission to ensure parties have time to develop business plans, assess market conditions and evaluate availability of equipment for relevant services, CTIA argued. “The uncertainty of the band-clearing process does not allow carriers to properly assess market conditions and make rational business decisions,” group argued. “In situations where there is a statutory conflict such as the one that is present here, the conflict may be reconciled through reasonable statutory interpretation,” Wheeler wrote. “A reasonable interpretation of these conflicting statutes should lead the Commission to postpone both of the 700 MHz auctions to further its statutory and public interest spectrum management responsibilities.” CTIA also noted Administration’s budget proposal earlier this year would postpone 700 MHz auctions. Budget blueprint said that if upper band auction were moved to 2004 from 2001 and Ch. 52-59 bidding to 2006 from 2002, budget offset of $2.6 billion for fiscal 2002 would be provided. “The uncertainties surrounding both of the 700 MHz auctions increases the risk that the auctions will be skewed so that licenses are not awarded to the parties who value them most highly, and who will provide the services consumers most desire,” Wheeler said. Responding to Paxson’s “media alert” on possibility of another FCC postponement of auctions, Wheeler said: “Paxson’s hell-bent-for-auction attitude is so strong he objects to our filing even before it is submitted” to FCC. Broadcasters, he said, now want to use spectrum they promised to turn back “for personal enrichment by exploiting a carefully crafted legislative loophole.” Meanwhile, Cingular is proposing plan that would offer alternative to Nextel’s band reconfiguration scheme that would swap spectrum at 700 MHz, 800 MHz and 900 MHz for new capacity at 800 MHz and 2.1 GHz. Private wireless users have raised concerns about disruption to their services under Nextel plan. Cingular plan, which hasn’t been formally unveiled and is still under development, would move public safety operators to 700 MHz and put 800 MHz spectrum now occupied by public safety users up for bid, said Brian Fontes, Cingular vp-federal relations. “This plan is just a draft,” he stressed: “We are circulating it to a number of different people or groups seeking their comment.” Fontes called plan “realistic approach” to interference public safety users are experiencing at 800 MHz, saying it has benefits for commercial, public safety and private wireless users. Proposal also would require reallocation of affected spectrum for public safety and homeland security uses, he said.