The Bureau of Industry and Security scheduled a meeting of the Materials and Equipment Technical Advisory Committee for Sept. 17 at 10 a.m., it said in a notice. The Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee will meet at 10 a.m. on Sept. 15, BIS said in another notice. Both meetings are via teleconference.
The Bureau of Industry and Security is seeking public input “on the effectiveness of its licensing procedures as defined in the Export Administration Regulations for the export of agricultural commodities to Cuba,” it said in a notice released Sept. 2. The comments will be used as part of the BIS biennial report to Congress, it said. Comments are due Oct. 5.
The Trump administration “is committed to bold, decisive action” against China that protects U.S. national and economic security interests, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said during a virtual Bureau of Industry and Security conference on Sept. 2. He cited as evidence BIS' s additional export restrictions on Huawei (see 2008170029) and President Donald Trump’s Aug. 6 executive order banning U.S. transactions with the parent companies of TikTok and WeChat. “We each must remain alert to China’s malign behavior and that of other foreign entities that seek our sensitive technologies to damage our economic and national security,” Ross said. “China is a capable, effective and adaptable adversary with unconstrained resources, who regularly uses our American freedom and rules-based norms to advance its goal of dominating global markets.”
Industry members should be aware of the “key North Korean procurement entities and deceptive techniques employed in the operation and support of the regime’s ballistic missile program,” the Office of Foreign Assets Control, the Bureau of Industry and Security and the State Department Bureau of International Security said in a guidance document. The procurement activities “expose the electronics, chemical, metals, and materials industries as well as the financial, transportation, and logistics sectors to the risk of possibly violating United Nations (UN) and U.S. sanctions, as well as the imposition of sanctions and penalties under various U.S. legal authorities,” they said.
Export compliance is never going to be perfect, panelists said, but with constant education, companies can ensure that their mistakes only warrant warning letters, not fines. The American Association of Exporters and Importers held a panel Sept. 1 about how export compliance plays out in the real world.
While industry welcomed the U.S. June decision to allow companies to more easily participate in standards-setting bodies in which Huawei is a member (see 2006160035), the administration should expand the rule to exempt all businesses on the Entity List, companies and trade groups said in comments last month. If the Bureau of Industry and Security does not expand the rule, companies will still be hampered at international standards bodies and could continue to cede technology leadership to China, they said.
A U.S. website infrastructure company said the Commerce Department determined not to penalize it after the company submitted a voluntary disclosure about potential export control and filing violations. Cloudflare, based in California, submitted disclosures last year (see 1909120065) to the Bureau of Industry and Security and the Census Bureau for making “incorrect” electronic export information statements and for allowing the export or “download of certain software prior to making required filings.” The company, in an Aug. 10 Securities and Exchange Commission filing, said its disclosures were “completed with no penalties” by Census in November and BIS in June.
A gaming software company said it may have violated U.S. sanctions and export reporting requirements, according to its regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unity Software, based in California, told the SEC it voluntarily disclosed possible export and sanctions violations to the Bureau of Industry and Security and the Office of Foreign Assets Control in August. The SEC filing, dated Aug. 24, is a registration statement ahead of the company's eventual initial public offering.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs began review of a proposed rule from the Bureau of Industry and Security related to its Strategic Trade Authorization (STA) license exception. The rule, which OIRA received Aug. 27, will clarify the “availability” and expand restrictions on availability of the license exception under the Export Administration Regulations.
The Bureau of Industry and Security released its long-awaited pre-rule for foundational technologies (see 2005190052), asking for industry feedback on the types of technologies BIS should target for potential export controls. The effort, which BIS is pursuing alongside restrictions for emerging technologies, seeks to pinpoint technologies that the agency said may warrant more strict controls.