The State Department is preparing to amend the U.S. Munitions List to update export controls surrounding weapons, spacecraft and military electronics, according to a senior State Department official. The agency also plans to issue another extension to allow employees involved in International Traffic in Arms Regulations-related activity to work remotely and is inching closer to publishing its first ITAR reorganization rule, said Mike Miller, the State Department’s deputy assistant secretary for defense trade in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.
China’s latest export control compliance guidelines closely mirror U.S. guidance and provide significant new insight into how the country will interpret its export control law (ECL) (see 2011030033 and 2010190033), law firms said. Companies operating in China may find that their U.S. compliance programs translate well to China’s rules, the firms said, which now include guidance for risk assessments, reporting procedures and audits.
The Bureau of Industry and Security issued more than $100,000 in combined penalties against two companies for illegally exporting thousands of dollars worth of goods to Iran, Russia and Ukraine. BIS imposed a $60,000 fine and temporarily denied the export privileges for Kleiss & Co., a Netherlands-based company that BIS said illegally shipped “extruded butyl sealants” from the U.S. to Iran. The agency also fined Texas-based TeleDynamics $55,000 for illegally exporting rifle scopes from the U.S. to Russia and Ukraine.
The U.S. issued guidance last week to address industry uncertainty and a rising number of questions about export licensing jurisdiction for goods sent under its Foreign Military Sales Program. The guidance -- which includes frequently asked questions developed by Homeland Security, CBP and the Commerce, State and Defense departments -- was issued because the agencies “continue to receive questions” about exports that were moved from the U.S. Munitions List to the Commerce Control List but are exported under FMS authority. They said exporters are “having difficulty” understanding how Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations, the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations and the FMS Program “relate to each other” for goods that have recently transitioned from the ITAR to the EAR.
A U.S. district court judge dismissed a case involving the seizure of a multimillion-dollar jet after Texas officials failed to prove the jet violated export regulations or was involved in a money-laundering scheme. Texas police seized the British Aerospace BAE 125 Series jet last year on tax evasion and money-laundering charges and suggested the owners violated the Export Administration Regulations, but a judge said police had no evidence or probable cause.
Two companies weren’t penalized after disclosing potential export control and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations to U.S. agencies, according to recent Securities and Exchange Commission filings. A10 Networks Inc., a software and hardware manufacturing company, said in its April 30 filing it received a warning letter from the Bureau of Industry and Security “in lieu of fines and penalties” after voluntarily disclosing potential illegal exports of encryption products (see 2011040041). Pactiv Evergreen, a North American food and beverage packaging company, said in its May 6 filing it disclosed potential FCPA violations to the Justice Department (see 2103040065), but the agency “decided to close its file on this matter without any action against the Company.” Pactiv said it’s awaiting a potential penalty decision from the SEC and can’t predict whether it will be fined.
The Bureau of Industry and Security again extended the comment period on an information collection related to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s bidding process, a notice said. The information collection pertains to the process BIS must undergo to determine whether U.S. firms are eligible to participate in NATO’s bidding process and supply certain goods. BIS previously requested comments in January and extended the comment period in March (see 2103170024). The agency said it will extend the comment period by an additional 30 days. Comments are now due by June 9.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said she plans to heavily enforce Entity List restrictions and more aggressively tackle the agency's emerging and foundational technology export control mandate. And although the agency’s review of China policies is ongoing (see 2101250049), she again stressed that Commerce doesn’t plan to remove export restrictions from Huawei and is looking for more companies to add to the Entity List.
U.S. exporters and forwarders are still unsure how much due diligence is enough to comply with the Commerce’s Department’s recently expanded end-user and end-use restrictions, National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America officials said. Although the Bureau of Industry and Security issued some guidance last year, the guidance didn't address all industry questions and was made more complicated by another set of restrictions that took effect this year, the officials said.
The top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee urged Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo to address the agency’s “incomplete” implementation of its emerging and foundational technology export control mandate when she testifies before the House this week. Raimondo -- who will testify May 6 before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice and Science -- should also address Commerce’s search for a Bureau of Industry and Security leader and outline the agency's export controls strategy to compete with China, said Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas.