The Bureau of Industry and Security withdrew a proposed rule from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs related to its strategic trade authorization (STA) license exception. The rule, which was received by OIRA Aug. 27 (see 2008280022) and withdrawn Nov. 12, would have clarified the “availability” and expanded restrictions on availability of the license exception under the Export Administration Regulations. A BIS spokesperson said the agency is still considering proposing the rule. “The rule was withdrawn for further informal interagency consultation,” the spokesperson said.
More than 20 industry groups urged the Bureau of Industry and Security to be cautious as it considers controls over foundational technologies (see 2008260045), saying the wrong approach could stifle innovation, damage U.S. competitiveness and lead to costly shifts in global supply chains. The groups said any new controls should only be imposed after a calculated process with significant input from industry, and should include license exceptions and exclusions.
The Bureau of Industry and Security extended the comment period (see 2008140002) for an information collection related to submitting declarations to the International Atomic Energy Agency for nuclear materials, a notice released Nov. 9 said. The IAEA requires information on nuclear-related products that may be used for “peaceful” nuclear purposes but also can be part of a nuclear weapons program, the notice said. The declarations provide the IAEA with information about the U.S. “commercial nuclear fuel cycle,” including nuclear equipment manufacturing and trade in nuclear-related goods. Comments are due Dec. 10.
The Bureau of Industry and Security extended the comment period for an information collection related to foreign importer certificates, end-user certificates, delivery verification certificates and firearms entry clearance requirements, a notice released Nov. 9 said. BIS said it wants more feedback on its collection for import and end-user certificates -- which are “obtained by the foreign importer and transmitted to the U.S. exporter” -- and delivery verification for BIS-controlled items. The agency is also seeking feedback on its information collection for firearms clearance requirements, which have changed due to the recent transfer of certain firearms controls from the State Department. “The Department of Commerce controls the [Commerce Control List] and must now take over this collection of information,” BIS said. The “entry clearance requirements for temporary imports will specify the [Export Administration Regulations] procedures for temporary imports and subsequent exports.” Comments are due Dec. 10.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs began a review of a final rule from the Bureau of Industry and Security to remove Hong Kong as a “separate destination” under the Export Administration Regulations. OIRA received the rule Nov. 6. BIS announced in June that it suspended license applications for shipments to Hong Kong (see 2006300050) to further align Hong Kong export regulations with mainland China.
FedEx is appealing a U.S. court’s September decision to dismiss the company’s 2019 lawsuit against the Bureau of Industry and Security (see 2009110038), according to court records filed Nov. 5. The shipping company told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that BIS was acting outside the authority of the Export Administration Regulations by applying overly burdensome liability standards on carriers (see 1906250030). But BIS said FedEx’s allegations were politically driven (see 1909110073) and the court said FedEx failed to prove the allegations (see 2009110038). In September, FedEx said it was “disappointed” by the court’s ruling and was considering an appeal (see 2009140003).
The Bureau of Industry and Security had planned to submit several export control proposals for the 2020 Wassenaar Arrangement but will have to wait another year due to disruptions caused by COVID-19 (see 2004290044). Matt Borman, the Commerce Department's deputy assistant secretary for export administration, said Wassenaar has been unable to meet this year and could not gather recommendations for dual-use controls from member states.
The Bureau of Industry and Security is considering export controls on certain “software” that can be exploited to develop biological weapons (see 2010010003) and requested feedback from industry about the impact of the controls, the agency said in a Nov. 5 notice. The controls would target software “for the operation of nucleic acid assemblers and synthesizers” that can design and build “functional genetic elements from digital sequence data.” The controls would fall under BIS’s emerging technology effort, and comments are due Dec. 21.
Three U.S. companies said they may have violated U.S. sanctions or export controls related to overseas sales and illegally processed payments, according to their most recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The potential violations include disclosures of dealings with sanctioned businesses, including sales to Iran.
The Bureau of Industry and Security did not impose penalties on a U.S. electronics company that had disclosed potential export violations (see 1911290004) for shipments involving Iran and Syria, Arrow Electronics said in an Oct. 29 Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Arrow, which disclosed that it helped ship $5,000 worth of products to resellers covered by U.S. sanctions, said BIS closed its investigation and issued the company a warning letter with no penalties. BIS declined to comment. Arrow said it is still being investigated by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control for the sanctions violations, which “may result in the imposition of penalties.”