In the Aug. 22 issue of the CBP Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 35), CBP published a notice that proposes to revoke and modify rulings and similar treatment regarding the tariff classification of work footwear.
Federal Maritime Commission said the following have filed applications for a license as a Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier (NVO) and/or Ocean Freight Forwarder (OFF)-Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested persons may contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573, at 202-523-5843 or at OTI@fmc.gov.
In the Aug. 22 issue of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 34), CBP published two notices that propose to revoke two rulings and similar treatment regarding the tariff classification of hole saw kits and automobile heater assemblies.
In the Aug. 15 issue of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 34), CBP published two notices of revocation and one notice of modification of rulings and treatment regarding the tariff classification of saddle blankets and vacuum hoses.
CBP issued its Aug. 22 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 35), which contains 4 notices of the following ruling actions:
In the Aug. 15 issue of the CBP Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 34), CBP published a notice that proposes to revoke and modify rulings and similar treatment regarding the tariff classification of work footwear.
In the Aug. 15 issue of the CBP Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 34), CBP published a notices that propose to revoke rulings and similar treatment regarding the tariff classification of goods under Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 9801.00.25.
Federal Maritime Commission said the following have filed applications for a license as a Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier (NVO) and/or Ocean Freight Forwarder (OFF)-Ocean Transportation Intermediary (OTI) pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested persons may contact the Office of Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573, at 202-523-5843 or at OTI@fmc.gov.
The Court of International Trade affirmed the International Trade Commission’s final negative determinations in the second sunset reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality steel products from Brazil and Japan, which resulted in revocation of the AD and CV suspension agreements for Brazil (A-351-828 / C-351-829) and the AD order for Japan (A-588-846). The domestic plaintiffs contested nearly every element of the ITC’s analysis, including the ITC’s decision not to cumulate the volume and effect of subject imports between the countries subject to the sunset review (which included Brazil, Japan and Russia), the likely volume and price effects of imports if the agreements and order were revoked, the vulnerability of domestic industry, and the likelihood of adverse impact, but CIT said the ITC’s determinations in each of these analyses were supported by substantial evidence. As such, CIT deferred to the ITC, and dismissed the challenge.
CBP issued its Aug. 15 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 34), which contains 4 notices of the following ruling actions: