Disney Plus got a reality check Tuesday morning when Twitter lit up with disgruntled customers reporting service fails on the first day of its highly publicized launch. Disney Plus, aggressively affordable at $6.99 per month -- $12.99 in a bundle with ESPN Plus and Hulu -- went live Tuesday. It promises streaming access at launch to nearly 500 films, 7,500 TV episodes and other content.
Senate Commerce Committee members teed up at least 11 amendments to the Satellite Television Access Reauthorization Act (S-2789) for committee consideration during its Wednesday executive session, amid some lawmakers’ displeasure with the existing measure. S-2789 would extend the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act through 2024 (see 1911060043). The deadline for senators to submit amendments expired Friday. Communications lobbyists told us they continue hearing chatter about additional language. Some expect Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., to agree to a compromise manager's amendment Tuesday night that would include text from other senators' proposals. The meeting begins at 10 a.m. in G50 Dirksen.
The Senate Intelligence Committee's “not planning” an open hearing on USA Patriot Act Section 215, Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., told us. That's despite requests from Democratic members Ron Wyden, Ore., and Martin Heinrich, N.M. (see 1911060045).
The FCC must take caution not to disrupt critical infrastructure as it opens the 6 GHz band to unlicensed users, said two state utility commissioners in support of a proposed NARUC resolution. State commissioners plan to vote on the 6 GHz statement at their meeting next week in San Antonio (see 1911050040). Senators and wireless carriers are also warning the FCC.
Power companies reminded West Virginia it’s not bound by federal rules as the Public Service Commission develops pole-attachment regulations. The PSC collected comments Thursday after lawmakers reverse pre-empted the FCC (see 1910150014). West Virginia aims to join 20 other states and Washington, D.C.
Both the C-Band Alliance and erstwhile member Eutelsat are pitching to the FCC transition plans for how to clear 300 MHz of the 3.7-4.2 GHz band. In talks with eighth-floor aides, Eutelsat backed private market-based deals for spectrum clearing instead of an FCC auction. But it worries none of the proposals is detailed and transparent enough to let the agency make a decision. Eutelsat left CBA in September (see 1909030041).
Regulators shouldn’t approve Google’s buy of Fitbit (see 1911010054) until various antitrust investigations are complete, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told us this week. Other concerned senators in interviews urged antitrust regulators to respond to a platform facing mounting scrutiny.
ABC, CBS and Fox agreed in recent days to a proposal by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to ensure satellite subscribers don’t lose access to distant signals if Congress allows the compulsory license language in the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act to expire at year-end. Graham called earlier this month for the broadcasters to provide a one-year license to satellite companies to transmit stations' signals after the distant-signal rules expire and to agree to negotiate carriage agreements for a further one-year beginning in 2021 (see 1911010059). The networks wrote Graham in letters we obtained Friday.
Concerns mounted Friday about a draft order to bar companies that may pose a national security threat to U.S. interests from having USF money paying for their equipment when used in American telecom networks. Wireless and wireline interests sought changes. Huawei, which could be subject to the ban, retorted. And a professor whose report was cited in the draft expressed some surprise at that inclusion, while defending his report from the company's criticism.
The FCC Media Bureau's finding that a group of broadcasters violated per se good-faith negotiating standards in talks with AT&T could be a seminal moment that puts teeth into what some consider toothless rules, lawyers with retransmission consent negotiation experience told us. Others said the rules aren't ambiguous, so Friday's decision (docket 19-168) in response to AT&T's complaint (see 1906190027) provides little new clarity. Everyone agreed such rulings in favor of complainants are rare, and some attorneys told us they believe this is the first time broadcasters have been found in violation of the good faith rules.