Future automated decision-making rules in California could have national impact on communications and internet companies, among many other industries, privacy experts said in interviews last week. The California Privacy Protection Agency board plans a Friday meeting to discuss an early proposal that the CPPA released last week. The proceeding is preliminary, with the agency saying it expects to formally begin the rulemaking next year.

The California Public Utilities Commission seeks comment on a staff proposal setting state LifeLine specific support amounts (SSA) and minimum service standards (MSS), Administrative Law Judge Stephanie Wang said Monday. File comments by Dec. 6 and replies by Jan. 9, the ALJ ruled. The Oct. 30 staff proposal would provide an SSA up to $20.75, increase the wireless broadband allowance MSS to 25 GB from 5 GB, and increase the wireline broadband speed MSS to 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload from 25/3 Mbps currently. For wireless, staff proposed a “dynamic approach” in which a Lifeline participant would move between two tiers “automatically based on their monthly data consumption without need for action.” Tier 1 would give 5 GB of data with a fixed SSA of up to $10.75, while Tier 2 would provide 25 GB of data and 10 GB hot spot data with a fixed subsidy of up to $20.75. "Staff set the subsidy at $20.75 so that when combined with the $9.25 federal LifeLine subsidy, California LifeLine participants are eligible for a total subsidy of $30 as with the ACP plan,” it said. "Service providers may not throttle speeds … except in accordance with reasonable network management practices, such as during an emergency where first responders require priority above other customers.” For wireline, staff proposed setting a voice-only tier SSA that would equal the lesser of $20.75 or 55% of a wireline service provider’s combined rate and end user common line charge. "The SSA floor would be $10.75 so that service providers with lower basic residential rates will provide and market robust offerings to CA LifeLine participants." For a second tier bundling voice and broadband, staff proposed a fixed $20.75 SSA. Staff said MSS for a foster youth program would generally be the same as proposed for the regular LifeLine wireless program. But since foster youth under 18 are ineligible for federal Lifeline support, staff proposes having California Lifeline make up the difference, "assuming that the amount is equal to or less than the current $9.25,” it said. Also, while the main program unsubscribes participants after they don't use it for 45 days, the foster program would switch participants to an "emergency service access plan" with 3 GB of wireless data and unlimited voice and text. Service providers would get a $10 monthly subsidy for each person on the emergency plan, it said. No co-pays would be required from foster youth.

Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition representatives met with FCC Wireline Bureau staff and aides to the Democratic commissioners in support of a proposed hot spot lending program. “There is a particularly important need to help low-income students access the internet across their daily journey, and lacking access to digital learning affects life trajectories and opportunities, especially for students,” said a filing posted Monday in docket 13-184. The program shouldn’t be too narrowly focused on funding “existing commercial mobile hotspot services,” the filing said. Representatives of the Open Technology Institute at New America and the Fresno, California, Unified School District also participated in the meetings.

The California Public Utilities Commission could shut out many wireless providers from participating in a proposed state LifeLine pilot if it proceeds with proposed rules, the National Lifeline Association (NaLA) warned. The CPUC received comments Tuesday on a proposed decision to approve two pilot programs to stack California LifeLine and federal affordable connectivity program (ACP) benefits (docket R.20-02-008). Verizon cautioned the CPUC to allow “reasonable network management.”

The communications market doesn’t need affordability metrics, telecom industry groups told the California Public Utilities Commission in comments this week. The CPUC received feedback Wednesday on a 2020 affordability report released last month and possibly applying the agency’s metrics to communications (see 2210140036). In a separate docket, the state commission received mixed reviews on a proposed pilot program for stacking federal affordable connectivity program (ACP) funds on state LifeLine support (see 2210140068).

As electric utilities and other companies move to private 4G and 5G networks, they will likely get better security than on their legacy networks, experts said during a Fierce Wireless virtual conference Tuesday. Speakers said security needs will vary by company and simplicity is usually better than building a network that’s too complex. “If you make something too complex, you have more variables, you’re asking for trouble,” said Roy Chua, principal at AvidThink: “Complexity is one of the biggest enemies of security.”

The California Public Utilities Commission may vote on May 19 to modify various account rules under the California Advanced Services Fund. Wednesday's proposed decision in docket R.20-08-021 would update program rules for the Broadband Public Housing Account, Broadband Adoption Account and Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Account in response to a $6 billion broadband package and three other 2021 state laws. Changes would include expanding eligibility for public housing grants and increasing that program’s minimum speed requirement to 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, from 6/1 Mbps today. For the adoption program, the proposal would double allowable reimbursement for take-home devices to $300, increase the current one-device-per-household limit to two and expand eligible program costs to include hot spots, modems, switches and computer warranties. The CPUC would increase maximum grants for regional consortiums to $200,000 from $150,000 annually. The commission proposed setting about a $72.6 million budget for CASF that would include about $30.9 million for the infrastructure program, $19 million for adoption, $10.7 million for consortiums, $10 million for public housing and $2 million for tribal technical assistance.

The FCC’s Emergency Connectivity Fund was enthusiastically praised by education advocates, schools and broadband providers in comments posted Tuesday in docket 21-93. The ECF program will give schools and libraries $7.17 billion to support remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (see 2103110037). Many suggested that the existing E-rate program is the best model for setting up the new funding as quickly as possible. Others questioned excluding smartphones from funding support.

Stakeholders are seeking simple enrollment in the FCC's $3.2 billion emergency broadband benefit program, they said in replies due Tuesday in docket 20-445. Adopt a broad definition of “household," Public Knowledge asked. The National Council of Urban Indian Health raised concerns about eligibility requirements, asking the commission to let tribal citizens not residing on tribal lands participate “to the same extent that American Indians and Alaska Natives residing on tribal lands are able.” Encourage broadest adoption so the hardest-hit communities can participate, said the LGBT Technology Partnership & Institute. That includes allowing noneligible telecom carriers to take part, it and others said. The group sided with AT&T in asking the commission to provide a 90-day notice that the funds are projected to be exhausted. Starry said non-ETCs should be automatically approved if they can “objectively show that they currently offer a discounted service to low-income consumers or individuals adversely affected” by the COVID-19 pandemic. ETCs should get the opportunity to participate “even outside their designated ETC service area,” said CTIA. Others disagreed. The California Public Utility Commission said non-ETCs should “submit election notices and compliance plans that will be reviewed and approved." Others asked that the program include support for equipment like Wi-Fi routers and hot spots. The Competitive Carriers Association asked to include smartphones as a “connected device” and focus on “whether a device meets minimum requirements to support the kinds of functions needed for online learning and other similar applications.” Tracfone, which is being bought by Verizon, said the definition of “tablet” should include “4G/LTE-capable devices with a touchscreen that support video conferencing.” The Illinois Office of Broadband supported leveraging resources of state authorities to promote awareness and suggested providing financial support. The FCC should confirm that it, not states and localities, has enforcement authority because that would otherwise “disincentivize provider participation,” said Altice.

Stakeholders are seeking simple enrollment in the FCC's $3.2 billion emergency broadband benefit program, they said in replies due Tuesday in docket 20-445. Adopt a broad definition of “household," Public Knowledge asked. The National Council of Urban Indian Health raised concerns about eligibility requirements, asking the commission to let tribal citizens not residing on tribal lands participate “to the same extent that American Indians and Alaska Natives residing on tribal lands are able.” Encourage broadest adoption so the hardest-hit communities can participate, said the LGBT Technology Partnership & Institute. That includes allowing noneligible telecom carriers to take part, it and others said. The group sided with AT&T in asking the commission to provide a 90-day notice that the funds are projected to be exhausted. Starry said non-ETCs should be automatically approved if they can “objectively show that they currently offer a discounted service to low-income consumers or individuals adversely affected” by the COVID-19 pandemic. ETCs should get the opportunity to participate “even outside their designated ETC service area,” said CTIA. Others disagreed. The California Public Utility Commission said non-ETCs should “submit election notices and compliance plans that will be reviewed and approved." Others asked that the program include support for equipment like Wi-Fi routers and hot spots. The Competitive Carriers Association asked to include smartphones as a “connected device” and focus on “whether a device meets minimum requirements to support the kinds of functions needed for online learning and other similar applications.” Tracfone, which is being bought by Verizon, said the definition of “tablet” should include “4G/LTE-capable devices with a touchscreen that support video conferencing.” The Illinois Office of Broadband supported leveraging resources of state authorities to promote awareness and suggested providing financial support. The FCC should confirm that it, not states and localities, has enforcement authority because that would otherwise “disincentivize provider participation,” said Altice.