The Commerce Department is giving advance notice that next month it will consider revoking the antidumping duty order on hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Russia (A-821-809) in an automatic five-year sunset review scheduled to begin in May (here). Advance notice is given because sunset reviews have short deadlines. An order will be revoked unless Commerce finds that revocation would lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and the International Trade Commission finds that revocation would result in continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry. As a result, a negative determination by either Commerce or the ITC would result in the revocation of this order.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission began five-year sunset reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from China (A-570-967/C-570-968) and the antidumping duty order on raw in-shell pistachios from Iran (A-507-502).
In the March 9 issue of the CBP Customs Bulletin (Vol. 50, No. 10) (here), CBP published notices that propose to revoke or modify rulings and similar treatment for baby wipe cases and footwear.
In the March 9 issue of the CBP Customs Bulletin (Vol. 50, No. 10) (here), CBP published notices that propose to revoke or modify rulings and similar treatment for cereal bars and car parts.
In the March 9 issue of the CBP Customs Bulletin (Vol. 50, No. 10) (here), CBP published notices that propose to revoke or modify rulings and similar treatment for antenna shields and woven fabric.
CBP released the March 9 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 50, No. 10), which contains the following ruling actions (here):
The Commerce Department is giving advance notice that next month it will consider revoking the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from China (A-570-967/C-570-968) and the antidumping duty order on in-shell raw pistachios from Iran (A-507-502) in automatic five-year sunset reviews scheduled to begin in April (here). Advance notice is given because sunset reviews have short deadlines. An order will be revoked unless Commerce finds that revocation would lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and the International Trade Commission finds that revocation would result in continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry. As a result, a negative determination by either Commerce or the ITC would result in the revocation of this order.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission began five-year sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Brazil (A-351-602), Japan (A-588-602), China (A-570-814) Taiwan (A-583-605) and Thailand (A-549-807); and frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil (A-351-838), India (A-533-840), China (A-570-893), Thailand (A-549-822) and Vietnam (A-552-802).
The Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (here), signed into law by President Barack Obama on Feb. 24, establishes new requirements for customs brokers to verify the identities of their importer clients, as well as a new importer of record database. It also provides for CBP's National Targeting Center to issue "Trade Alerts" directing CBP port personnel to inspect high-risk merchandise, and directs CBP to accept private sector training on classification, appraisement, and other enforcement issues.
The Commerce Department is giving advance notice that next month it will consider revoking the antidumping duty orders on carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Brazil (A-351-602), China (A-570-504), Japan (A-588-602), Taiwan (A-583-605) and Thailand (A-549-807); and frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil (A-351-838), China (A-570-893), India (A-533-840), Thailand (A-549-822) and Vietnam (A-552-802) in an automatic five-year sunset review scheduled to begin in March (here). Advance notice is given because sunset reviews have short deadlines. An order will be revoked unless Commerce finds that revocation would lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and the International Trade Commission finds that revocation would result in continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry. As a result, a negative determination by either Commerce or the ITC would result in the revocation of this order.