A story on an FCC cable franchising rulemaking misspelled the name of Best Best's Gerard Lederer (see 1812200042).

FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel raised concerns about the halt in equipment certifications caused by the federal shutdown. Industry officials said last week that has emerged as a concern with the FCC mostly shuttered since Thursday (see 1901040008). “Go ahead, take a look at the back of the nearest electronic device. You'll see an @fcc number,” Rosenworcel tweeted Tuesday. “The agency certifies every innovative mobile phone, television, and computer that emits radio frequency before they can head to market. Guess what is not happening during the shutdown?”

Extending its expectation of keeping the federal judiciary open through Friday, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said it's "working toward the goal of sustaining paid operations through Jan. 18." If existing funding runs out, the judiciary will "operate under the terms of the Anti-Deficiency Act, which allows 'essential work' to continue." The "mission critical work includes activities to support the exercise of the courts’ constitutional powers under Article III, specifically the resolution of cases and related services," the office said Monday, with each court determining the staff needed. It added that in response to DOJ requests, "some federal courts have issued orders suspending, postponing, or holding in abeyance civil cases in which the government is a party for a limited period, subject to further consideration, or until appropriated funds become available." The department got a stay Monday (see here, in Pacer) from the U.S. District Court in Washington on a Friday deadline for filing a joint status report in docket 17-cv-02409 on litigation over Protect Democracy Project's Freedom of Information Act request for White House communications about AT&T's Time Warner buy (see 1803060004). That status report now is due after DOJ funding is restored. Oral arguments will go on as scheduled this month in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, it says. That includes a GLH Communications v. FCC wireless case Wednesday, which the commission says is auction related. The D.C. Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument Feb. 1 on challenges to the FCC's net neutrality rollback in Mozilla v. FCC, No. 18-1051.

Bid commitments in the 28 GHz auction reached $690.7 million Monday, up from $690.3 million Friday, with provisionally winning bids on 2,938 of 3,072 licenses, FCC results show. The auction (see 1812280030) shifted to six rounds a day Monday, up from four Friday.

FTC deal reviews aren’t as effective with shutdown-mandated “skeleton crews,” Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter tweeted Monday, calling it a “bad situation.” She responded to a thread from Public Knowledge Policy Counsel-Competition Charlotte Slaiman suggesting transactions can be approved by default if enforcers don’t take action. The FTC and DOJ have an initial 30 days to respond to review applications, Slaiman noted. “It’s not that folks aren’t reviewing, it’s the excellent point that this work can’t be done as effectively with a skeleton crew,” Slaughter wrote.

Judge Robert Wilkins will replace Judge Judith Rogers on the panel reviewing challenges to the FCC's net neutrality rollback order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit announced (in Pacer) Monday in Mozilla v. FCC, No. 18-1051. The move doesn't affect the panel's 2-1 majority of Democratic appointees (see 1901020040): President Barack Obama nominated Wilkins and President Bill Clinton appointed Rogers. The other judges are Patricia Millett, another Obama appointee, and Stephen Williams, appointed by President Ronald Reagan. Asked if the switch changed things, Andrew Schwartzman, counsel for petitioner Benton Foundation, emailed: "Not too much. ... Wilkins and Rogers are unlikely to be very different ideologically. However, he has much less of a track record on tech issues. ... He is more active in oral argument than Judge Rogers. ... When Judge Rogers presides, she is very much by-the-book. Judge Millett will now be presiding; she may be more lax about adhering to time limits." Free State Foundation President Randolph May expects the FCC would "feel more comfortable" with Rogers than Wilkins "on the theory that, in general, he may be more reflexively pro-regulatory and more likely to go along with Judge Millett. But this is really reading tea leaves at the margin.”

The head of a Georgetown Law communications and tech program and another lawyer there expect to change roles when the project gets a new chief, they told us last week. The changes are being sparked by the retirement of Angela Campbell, who for about 30 years headed at the law school the Institute for Public Representation's Communications & Technology Law Clinic. The school has been looking for a successor for some time, and Campbell hasn't decided if she will continue working at Georgetown after her directorship ends June 30. The clinic's Andrew Schwartzman, Benton Foundation senior counselor there, may also leave, he said. "My expectation is that I will do something else as of July 1." He hopes "to have continuing relationship with the Benton Foundation." The Benton Foundation "is honored to work with Andy beyond June 30," emailed Executive Director Adrianne Furniss about Schwartzman. "Among other things, Andy will continue to serve as counsel for Benton who is one of the petitioners" in the Mozilla v. FCC net neutrality case (see 1901030012), she added. Campbell expects to keep working on kids media as a Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood board member; the vice chair now, she likely will be elected chair in June. Her IPR program likely will remain involved in kidvid and political broadcast issues at the FCC and with kids' privacy and FTC Children's Online Privacy Protection Act rules. "It’s a good time while it's going well to have a transition" at IPR, she said. "There are a lot of qualified candidates out there, so I’m pretty confident it will work out well."

Former AT&T Senior Executive Vice President Bob Quinn said he joined Wilkinson Barker (see the personals section of the Jan. 4 issue) with an eye on building its privacy practice. Chief privacy officer at AT&T for five years, Quinn left in May because of controversy over the company's hiring of Donald Trump personal lawyer Michael Cohen (see 1805110029). Now, Quinn said he wants to focus on privacy. “With all of the data breaches, companies have spent a lot of money in the area of cyber focused on data breach and trying to understand where their weaknesses are, because nobody wants to be the next headline,” Quinn told us Thursday. “In the area of privacy, I don’t think people have spent the money to understand what data they’re holding onto, what data they’re collecting, how they’re using it, what disclosures they’re making to consumers.” Lack of focus on the collection of data “left a bad taste in the mouth” of European regulators and that’s why they approved the EU general data protection regulation, he said. Similarly, that’s why California lawmakers approved a state privacy law last summer (see 1806280054), he said. “Ultimately, we’re going to have a federal law and right now is the time where people are really kind of screaming for more information on privacy, especially with this debate heating up in the next year on Capitol Hill,” Quinn said. “I think a privacy law is coming.” How GDPR unfolds will have an impact in the U.S., he said.

Petitioners, the FCC and DOJ proposed a 150-minute format for Feb. 1 oral argument on challenges to the commission's net neutrality rollback order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Mozilla v. FCC, No. 18-1051 (consolidated). General Counsel Thomas Johnson is to argue for the commission. Responding to a court request to streamline the argument, the parties, backed by intervenors, jointly asked (in Pacer) Wednesday that each side be given 75 minutes, with challengers' time subdivided into four categories of issues, presented consecutively: (1) Communications Act Title I broadband reclassification, Section 706 and competition (25 minutes); (2) Administrative Procedure Act, Section 257, and mobile broadband (25 minutes); (3) FCC consideration of public safety and government services (10 minutes); and (4) Pre-emption of state law (15 minutes). Nongovernment petitioners and intervenors would argue the first two, represented by Pantelis Michalopoulos of Steptoe & Johnson, Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell and Stephanie Weiner of Harris Wiltshire; local and state government petitioners would argue the second two, represented by Danielle Goldstein of Santa Clara County, California, and Steven Wu of New York state. The FCC and ISP intervenors could address the issues in a different sequence, represented by Johnson (60 minutes) and Jonathan Nuechterlein of Sidley Austin (15 minutes). Petitioners can reserve rebuttal time. The judges hearing the case are Judith Rogers, Patricia Millett and Stephen Williams (see 1901020040).

Arizona and Iowa commissions said they're looking into the multistate CenturyLink outage that disrupted 911, joining other states making inquiries (see 1901020022) and the FCC (see 1812280033). The Arizona Corporation Commission Utilities Division opened a docket (T-01051B-19-0001) Wednesday. "Staff believes this is a public health and safety issue that should be taken seriously and addressed in a expeditious manner," said Utilities Division Director Elijah Abinah in a Wednesday letter to the company. State law requires telecom companies to notify the commission about outages, but staff isn't aware of any notification from CenturyLink -- the agency found out from a news report, he said. Abinah asked the company to detail the cause and extent of the outage and what actions CenturyLink plans to prevent future outages. The Iowa Utilities Board “is aware of the outage and is looking into the impact to Iowa customers,” its spokesperson said. The telco said it's in touch with policymakers and will cooperate with any investigation; it didn't comment further Thursday.