Recognizing FCC approval of net neutrality regulations raised questions about preserving the privacy of customer information, including the FTC's role (see 1502240070), FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said his agency will hold an April workshop for stakeholders to discuss how best to move forward. Wheeler did not give more specifics Tuesday night as he spoke at the Center for Democracy & Technology’s annual dinner. The agency Wednesday didn't provide more information.

Minors aren't immune from becoming victims of revenge porn, opponents of websites that release intimate videos and photos without the subjects' permission said in interviews this week. Kids appear on all revenge porn sites that law and technology blogger Adam Steinbaugh came across, he said. In some instances, a police report saying the girl is underage accompanies the pictures, Steinbaugh said. All sexual images and videos of children 15 and younger, as tracked by the U.K.-based Internet Watch Foundation, have been taken from an original online location and uploaded to another site, according to an IWF study sponsored by Microsoft and released Tuesday. Sixteen states have revenge porn-specific legislation, but none has a specific clause addressing how children are affected because those images already are covered by child pornography laws, said Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI) Executive Director Holly Jacobs. Adults have also complained about revenge porn, and the FTC has acted to shut down a site (see 1502040042).

AARP urged the FCC to go beyond its proposal to require at least eight hours of battery backup power and instead advocated providing at least 12 hours, while Public Knowledge went further and urged that the requirement be at least a week of power. Indicative of the gulf over the role the agency should play in the IP transition -- over a range of items in the tech transition rulemaking, including tougher discontinuation hurdles and greater assurances of last-mile special access by competitive carriers (see 1411210037) -- AT&T and Verizon opposed any new backup power requirements. Reply comments were due Monday night in docket 13-5 and posted Tuesday.

The FCC likely will try to highlight the most complicated aspects of the incentive auction as it defends its auction policies from challenges by NAB and Sinclair Broadcast Group during oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Thursday, several broadcast attorneys told us. Emphasizing the technically challenging aspects of the auction makes it more likely that the three-judge panel hearing the case will defer to the FCC as an expert federal agency and uphold the auction order, the attorneys told us. Attorneys for NAB and Sinclair will in turn try to present their issues in as simple terms as possible, an attorney who represents broadcasters told us. The FCC, NAB and Sinclair all declined to comment on their strategies for the court proceeding.

The FirstNet board voted unanimously Monday to seek comment on proposed new interpretations of elements of its role under the 2012 Spectrum Act related to states that opt out of FirstNet deployment and management of a state’s radio access network (RAN) in favor of a state-run RAN. FirstNet believes that Congress intended to give states the option to customize their RANs to local needs but didn’t intend exercise of that option to “also deny substantial funding to many other states,” FirstNet Chairwoman Sue Swenson said during the meeting.

Dish Network’s coordinated bidding with two designated entities in the AWS-3 auction, which allegedly allowed it to buy spectrum at a reduced price, shows why the FCC should further restrict joint bidding, Verizon said in reply comments on competitive bidding rules. AT&T also called for restrictions on joint bidding. But DE Council Tree defended the program as a whole and said it led to a more competitive AWS-3 auction. The comments were filed in docket 12-268.

The FCC has not only “failed to pursue meaningful solutions” to making sure broadband is being deployed in a timely and reasonable fashion, but exacerbated the problem by “arbitrarily raising” the broadband benchmark speed and imposing Communications Act Title II regulation on broadband in the net neutrality order, NCTA said in comments filed Friday. Responded to the agency’s January notice of inquiry (see 1501290043) on improving broadband deployment, the comments hadn't been posted in docket 14-126. USTelecom also filed comments on the NOI Friday, which, according to its blog, focused on removing “outdated legacy regulations” and “restrictive local rules and regulations.” The commission failed to “effectively implement many of its own prior recommendations,” including adding broadband to Lifeline and implementing the Remote Areas Fund (RAF) to deploy broadband to unserved areas, NCTA said. The commission should immediately revoke offers to ILECs for high-cost USF support that don't meet the new 25 Mbps download/3 Mbps upload standard, it said. The funding should be offered on a competitively neutral basis to any qualified broadband provider willing to provide the new speed, NCTA said. The agency should also implement the RAF and issue an NPRM to create a broadband Lifeline program, the filing said. An independent third party should also examine why there hasn’t been more progress extending broadband deployment to unserved areas, even though more than $28 billion in federal funding has been spent on the goal since 2010, the filing said. USTelecom urged the agency to grant its October 2014 forbearance petition (see 1410070050), reforming state and local regulations “that impede a provider’s ability to roll out broadband services,” and ensure that broadband providers can deploy fiber in multi-dwelling units. The FCC should “promote efficient and carefully targeted broadband deployment in rural areas” through the Connect America Fund and develop “’sooner rather than later’ a long-term universal service solution for rate-of-return carriers,” USTelecom said.

The FCC has not only “failed to pursue meaningful solutions” to making sure broadband is being deployed in a timely and reasonable fashion, but exacerbated the problem by “arbitrarily raising” the broadband benchmark speed and imposing Communications Act Title II regulation on broadband in the net neutrality order, NCTA said in comments filed Friday. Responded to the agency’s January notice of inquiry (see 1501290043) on improving broadband deployment, the comments hadn't been posted in docket 14-126. USTelecom also filed comments on the NOI Friday, which, according to its blog, focused on removing “outdated legacy regulations” and “restrictive local rules and regulations.” The commission failed to “effectively implement many of its own prior recommendations,” including adding broadband to Lifeline and implementing the Remote Areas Fund (RAF) to deploy broadband to unserved areas, NCTA said. The commission should immediately revoke offers to ILECs for high-cost USF support that don't meet the new 25 Mbps download/3 Mbps upload standard, it said. The funding should be offered on a competitively neutral basis to any qualified broadband provider willing to provide the new speed, NCTA said. The agency should also implement the RAF and issue an NPRM to create a broadband Lifeline program, the filing said. An independent third party should also examine why there hasn’t been more progress extending broadband deployment to unserved areas, even though more than $28 billion in federal funding has been spent on the goal since 2010, the filing said. USTelecom urged the agency to grant its October 2014 forbearance petition (see 1410070050), reforming state and local regulations “that impede a provider’s ability to roll out broadband services,” and ensure that broadband providers can deploy fiber in multi-dwelling units. The FCC should “promote efficient and carefully targeted broadband deployment in rural areas” through the Connect America Fund and develop “’sooner rather than later’ a long-term universal service solution for rate-of-return carriers,” USTelecom said.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said he wants to wait until the Senate Intelligence Committee’s much-anticipated redraft of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) “winds its way” through committee markup before taking further action within Senate Homeland Security on cybersecurity information sharing legislation. Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Vice Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., have been circulating a draft of the bill that includes more privacy protections than the bill's 2014 version, but most major privacy advocates already have opposed it publicly. The 2014 CISA cleared Senate Intelligence but never got a full Senate vote. Burr and Feinstein expect to introduce the bill and hold a closed-session markup as soon as Tuesday and definitely before the end of the month, an industry lobbyist told us. Johnson said during a USTelecom event Friday that he wants to “see the reaction” to the reintroduced CISA post-markup. Once “more people evaluate it,” Senate Homeland Security “will hop into the fray” and hold additional hearings, Johnson said.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said he wants to wait until the Senate Intelligence Committee’s much-anticipated redraft of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA) “winds its way” through committee markup before taking further action within Senate Homeland Security on cybersecurity information sharing legislation. Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Vice Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., have been circulating a draft of the bill that includes more privacy protections than the bill's 2014 version, but most major privacy advocates already have opposed it publicly. The 2014 CISA cleared Senate Intelligence but never got a full Senate vote. Burr and Feinstein expect to introduce the bill and hold a closed-session markup as soon as Tuesday and definitely before the end of the month, an industry lobbyist told us. Johnson said during a USTelecom event Friday that he wants to “see the reaction” to the reintroduced CISA post-markup. Once “more people evaluate it,” Senate Homeland Security “will hop into the fray” and hold additional hearings, Johnson said.