President Donald Trump’s signature Monday enacting the Congressional Review Act measure ending FCC ISP privacy rules immediately drew a flurry of responses that included outcry from defenders of the rules and praise from ISP industry officials. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and Commissioner Mike O’Rielly lauded the new law. “To deliver that consistent and comprehensive protection, the [FCC] will be working with the [FTC] to restore the FTC’s authority to police Internet service providers’ privacy practices,” Pai said. “We need to put America’s most experienced and expert privacy cop back on the beat. And we need to end the uncertainty and confusion that was created in 2015 when the FCC intruded in this space.” Such a transition could involve undoing FCC Communications Act Title II reclassification of broadband. “The parade of horribles trotted out to scare the American people about its passage are completely fictitious, especially since parts of the rules never even went into effect,” said O’Rielly. Consumers “should feel confident,” said USTelecom President Jonathan Spalter. American Cable Association President Matt Polka said “nothing changes” in protecting consumer privacy. FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn tweeted that she awoke “from what I hoped was a bad dream.” FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny also tweeted her opposition. “The Republicans thought they could jam through this harmful law without anyone noticing,” said House Commerce Committee ranking member Frank Pallone, D-N.J. “Despite their effort to hide this latest corporate giveaway, Americans of all political stripes spoke out loud and clear to say that they wanted to keep their personal information private and secure.” Trump “made a grave mistake by signing this disastrous legislation,” said Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., calling the measure “as anti-consumer as it gets.” Consumer Federation of America Director-Consumer Protection and Privacy Susan Grant said “the fight is not over” and the groups “will continue to push for real privacy protections for Americans." She was echoed by Public Knowledge. "We've raised $23,000 to put up billboards exposing the lawmakers that voted to gut Internet privacy," Fight for the Future tweeted Tuesday. Richard Bennett, network architect and free-market blogger, lamented in a blog post about the “firestorm of delusion” about the issue. “The FCC will now draft a replacement regulation only constrained by the law and the requirement that it’s not substantially similar to the old regulation,” he said. “The new rules will harmonize the FCC’s approach to privacy with the FTC privacy framework.” Since the House passage of the CRA resolution, House Communications Subcommittee Chairman Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., has "received so many calls" on the issue, she said in a video, explaining her reasoning for the resolution: "This resolution does not make you less safe on the internet."

The International Trade Commission should highlight foreign countries' data localization laws as a top barrier to digital trade in a forthcoming report, telecom and tech officials said Tuesday during an ITC hearing. The commission began an investigation in February at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative's request into developments in the digital trade market and how laws in the U.S. and “key foreign markets” are affecting digital trade. The ITC is examining laws in the EU, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and Russia. The commission is expected to release the first of three reports on the investigation by Aug. 29, with the other two reports to be released in 2018 and 2019.

President Donald Trump’s signature Monday enacting the Congressional Review Act measure ending FCC ISP privacy rules immediately drew a flurry of responses that included outcry from defenders of the rules and praise from ISP industry officials. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and Commissioner Mike O’Rielly lauded the new law. “To deliver that consistent and comprehensive protection, the [FCC] will be working with the [FTC] to restore the FTC’s authority to police Internet service providers’ privacy practices,” Pai said. “We need to put America’s most experienced and expert privacy cop back on the beat. And we need to end the uncertainty and confusion that was created in 2015 when the FCC intruded in this space.” Such a transition could involve undoing FCC Communications Act Title II reclassification of broadband. “The parade of horribles trotted out to scare the American people about its passage are completely fictitious, especially since parts of the rules never even went into effect,” said O’Rielly. Consumers “should feel confident,” said USTelecom President Jonathan Spalter. American Cable Association President Matt Polka said “nothing changes” in protecting consumer privacy. FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn tweeted that she awoke “from what I hoped was a bad dream.” FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny also tweeted her opposition. “The Republicans thought they could jam through this harmful law without anyone noticing,” said House Commerce Committee ranking member Frank Pallone, D-N.J. “Despite their effort to hide this latest corporate giveaway, Americans of all political stripes spoke out loud and clear to say that they wanted to keep their personal information private and secure.” Trump “made a grave mistake by signing this disastrous legislation,” said Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., calling the measure “as anti-consumer as it gets.” Consumer Federation of America Director-Consumer Protection and Privacy Susan Grant said “the fight is not over” and the groups “will continue to push for real privacy protections for Americans." She was echoed by Public Knowledge. "We've raised $23,000 to put up billboards exposing the lawmakers that voted to gut Internet privacy," Fight for the Future tweeted Tuesday. Richard Bennett, network architect and free-market blogger, lamented in a blog post about the “firestorm of delusion” about the issue. “The FCC will now draft a replacement regulation only constrained by the law and the requirement that it’s not substantially similar to the old regulation,” he said. “The new rules will harmonize the FCC’s approach to privacy with the FTC privacy framework.” Since the House passage of the CRA resolution, House Communications Subcommittee Chairman Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., has "received so many calls" on the issue, she said in a video, explaining her reasoning for the resolution: "This resolution does not make you less safe on the internet."

The International Trade Commission should highlight foreign countries' data localization laws as a top barrier to digital trade in a forthcoming report, telecom and tech officials said Tuesday during an ITC hearing. The commission began an investigation in February at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative's request into developments in the digital trade market and how laws in the U.S. and “key foreign markets” are affecting digital trade. The ITC is examining laws in the EU, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and Russia. The commission is expected to release the first of three reports on the investigation by Aug. 29, with the other two reports to be released in 2018 and 2019.

The International Trade Commission should highlight foreign countries' data localization laws as a top barrier to digital trade in a forthcoming report, telecom and tech officials said Tuesday during an ITC hearing. The commission began an investigation in February at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative's request into developments in the digital trade market and how laws in the U.S. and “key foreign markets” are affecting digital trade. The ITC is examining laws in the EU, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and Russia. The commission is expected to release the first of three reports on the investigation by Aug. 29, with the other two reports to be released in 2018 and 2019.

The U.S. Postal Service is rolling out an optional free feature nationwide that will send via email scanned images of the exterior of people's mail before they get physical delivery, potentially raising privacy and security issues. A privacy advocate feared the service could be exploited by phishers and scammers to provide fraudulent third-party interactive links in the emailed images, while another expert said malvertising could be encouraged by the service, which also seems like it could benefit customers.

The U.S. Postal Service is rolling out an optional free feature nationwide that will send via email scanned images of the exterior of people's mail before they get physical delivery, potentially raising privacy and security issues. A privacy advocate feared the service could be exploited by phishers and scammers to provide fraudulent third-party interactive links in the emailed images, while another expert said malvertising could be encouraged by the service, which also seems like it could benefit customers.

Music industry entities' Thursday launch of ValuetheMusic.com appears aimed at influencing simultaneous examinations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Section 512 on Capitol Hill, at the Copyright Office and the EU, lawyers and lobbyists said in interviews. The RIAA-led website directly criticizes Google-owned YouTube's use of Section 512's safe harbor provisions at a time when Google is under fire for its placement of advertising next to objectionable content (see 1703240004).

Music industry entities' Thursday launch of ValuetheMusic.com appears aimed at influencing simultaneous examinations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's Section 512 on Capitol Hill, at the Copyright Office and the EU, lawyers and lobbyists said in interviews. The RIAA-led website directly criticizes Google-owned YouTube's use of Section 512's safe harbor provisions at a time when Google is under fire for its placement of advertising next to objectionable content (see 1703240004).

CBP will lead implementation of President Donald Trump’s March 31 executive order addressing unpaid antidumping and countervailing duties (see 1703310076), the agency said in a fact sheet (here). The executive order (here) designates the Department of Homeland Security as the head government entity to develop plans by June 29 to require importers deemed a risk to U.S. revenue to “provide security” for AD and CV duty liability through bonds and “other legal measures”; to start implementing a strategy to counter violations of U.S. trade and customs laws; and to interdict and dispose of inadmissible merchandise. Interdiction and disposal plans would include “methods other than seizure,” according to the executive order.