President Donald Trump directed U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to consider raising the third round of Trade Act Section 301 tariffs to 25 percent from 10 percent, the USTR and others confirmed Wednesday afternoon.

President Donald Trump directed U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to consider raising the third round of Trade Act Section 301 tariffs to 25 percent from 10 percent, the USTR and others confirmed Wednesday afternoon.

High-end home and car audio supplier AudioControl opposes Trade Act Section 301 tariffs on electronics components and materials imported from China “and used in our US manufacturing of our products” because it will “cause the adverse effect of what is intended” in trying to thwart allegedly unfair Chinese trade practices, said CEO Alex Camara in comments posted Friday in docket USTR-2018-0026.

The anticipated unwinding of Sinclair's planned buy of Tribune and last week’s court decision upholding the UHF discount aren’t considered likely to affect what the FCC eventually does to the national cap (see 1807250050). They could affect timing, said broadcasters, attorneys and industry officials in interviews.

Intel opposes the proposed 25 percent Trade Act Section 301 duties on semiconductor imports from China, it said in comments posted Wednesday in docket USTR-2018-0018. Intel is one of many tech interests arguing this week for removing Chinese semiconductor imports from the tariffs list because most semiconductors the U.S. imports are made in the U.S., shipped to China for final, low-end assembly, testing and packaging (ATP), and then shipped back to the U.S. “No rational U.S. semiconductor company is going to incur the very high costs and other risks raised by relocating an ATP facility in China with an already established ecosystem to a green field site in another country,” said Intel. It estimates it would cost $650 million to $875 million to move an ATP plant out of China. The Internet Association wants to testify at U.S. Trade Representative hearings Aug. 20-23 to urge removing 22 tariff lines “that cover products internet companies use to function on a daily basis,” said the company in a filing posted Thursday in docket USTR-2018-0026. IA wants excluded from proposed 10 percent tariffs “control or adapter units for automatic data processing machines” and other components. Imposing new duties on the 22 tariff lines“would not help to correct China's practices, but would cause disproportionate economic harm to American internet companies,” said the association. Friday is the deadline for requests to appear.

Intel opposes the proposed 25 percent Trade Act Section 301 duties on semiconductor imports from China, it said in comments posted Wednesday in docket USTR-2018-0018. Intel is one of many tech interests arguing this week for removing Chinese semiconductor imports from the tariffs list because most semiconductors the U.S. imports are made in the U.S., shipped to China for final, low-end assembly, testing and packaging (ATP), and then shipped back to the U.S. “No rational U.S. semiconductor company is going to incur the very high costs and other risks raised by relocating an ATP facility in China with an already established ecosystem to a green field site in another country,” said Intel. It estimates it would cost $650 million to $875 million to move an ATP plant out of China. The Internet Association wants to testify at U.S. Trade Representative hearings Aug. 20-23 to urge removing 22 tariff lines “that cover products internet companies use to function on a daily basis,” said the company in a filing posted Thursday in docket USTR-2018-0026. IA wants excluded from proposed 10 percent tariffs “control or adapter units for automatic data processing machines” and other components. Imposing new duties on the 22 tariff lines“would not help to correct China's practices, but would cause disproportionate economic harm to American internet companies,” said the association. Friday is the deadline for requests to appear.

It's not easy or cheap to relocate semiconductor packaging plants from China to other countries of origin to avoid tariffs, said Intel in comments posted Wednesday in docket USTR-2018-0018 opposing the proposed 25 percent Trade Act Section 301 duties on Chinese semiconductor imports. Many tech interests argued this week for removing Chinese semiconductor imports from the tariffs list because most semiconductors the U.S. imports are made in the U.S., shipped to China for final, low-end assembly, testing and packaging (ATP), and then shipped back to the U.S. (see 1807240005). Imposing those duties would require U.S. semiconductor manufacturers to pay tariffs on their own products, they said. Though U.S. firms can limit or avoid their exposure to Chinese tariffs by moving their ATP plants elsewhere, "no rational U.S. semiconductor company is going to incur the very high costs and other risks raised by relocating an ATP facility in China with an already established ecosystem to a green field site in another country,” said Intel. It estimates it would cost $650 million to $875 million to move an ATP plant out of China, “depending on its size and where it would be relocated.” That includes the costs of constructing a new building and buying or leasing new land to build it on, hauling at least 80 percent of the equipment from the existing facility to the new one and buying new, “duplicative” equipment to “ensure continuous operation at the existing site while the new site is being built out,” said Intel. Other costs include paying for the labor “overlap” of two to three years “while the new site ramps up and the existing one winds down,” and the “incremental product freight incurred by relocating the plant,” it said. “China is our industry's biggest market and has some of our biggest customers,” it said. “These significant costs assume very limited disruption in servicing customers.”

Parties bombarded the FCC with conflicting advice on one-touch, make-ready plans and other pole-attachment proposals in a draft order aimed at facilitating broadband deployment. Electric utilities pushed for changes to proposed communications provider self-help in the power spaces on poles, and cable continued voicing concern about OTMR treatment of existing attachments. Incumbent telcos sought stronger action to lower the attachment rates they pay pole owners, though Verizon backed OTMR and others supported agency proposals. Filings were posted in docket 17-84 Thursday as lobbying restrictions took effect and the draft was included in the agenda for the Aug. 2 commissioners' meeting.

Parties bombarded the FCC with conflicting advice on one-touch, make-ready plans and other pole-attachment proposals in a draft order aimed at facilitating broadband deployment. Electric utilities pushed for changes to proposed communications provider self-help in the power spaces on poles, and cable continued voicing concern about OTMR treatment of existing attachments. Incumbent telcos sought stronger action to lower the attachment rates they pay pole owners, though Verizon backed OTMR and others supported agency proposals. Filings were posted in docket 17-84 Thursday as lobbying restrictions took effect and the draft was included in the agenda for the Aug. 2 commissioners' meeting.

Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, Republicans from Texas, told us they’re working to amend music copyright legislation after concerns raised by Blackstone Group (see 1807240054). Two prominent songwriter groups accused the private equity firm and its music licensing entities of a greedy political play that could sink rare consensus music copyright change.