Tech companies and advertisers made a last stand, raising concerns about the California Consumer Privacy Act before it takes effect Jan. 1. Comments were due Friday on implementing rules Attorney General Xavier Becerra (D) proposed in October and that must be finalized by July 1 when enforcement begins (see 1910100042). The AG office didn’t post the most recent comments online. Some sent theirs to us.
Almost two years after Chairman Ajit Pai announced the media modernization effort, many items taken up under that umbrella have had a small scope, an uncontentious docket, and sometimes don’t even draw formal responses from the opposing party. General agreement and a tight focus aren't bad things, broadcast and MVPD attorneys and FCC officials said of the program. “That the items are often unanimous is a compelling case for getting rid of the rules,” said Matthew Berry, Pai’s chief of staff.
Privacy proposals from Senate Commerce Committee Republicans and Democrats both provide stronger consumer protections than California’s privacy law, said Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., Wednesday. During a long-awaited hearing, ranking member Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., raised concerns about third-party data sharing. Lawmakers gave varying views on a private right of action.
CBP is hoping to begin its risk-based bonding program for new importers of merchandise subject to antidumping and countervailing duties in March 2020, but there still remain some thorny issues that need to be ironed out. The agency is still working on ACE enhancements, including identifiers and queries for new importers, said Lisa Gelsomino, of Avalon Risk Management, at the Dec. 4 meeting of the Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee (COAC).
Privacy proposals from Senate Commerce Committee Republicans and Democrats both provide stronger consumer protections than California’s privacy law, said Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., Wednesday. During a long-awaited hearing, ranking member Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., raised concerns about third-party data sharing. Lawmakers gave varying views on a private right of action.
Two prominent Republicans questioned the suitability of switching tariffs for quotas because of currency manipulation in Brazil and Argentina, as President Donald Trump said Dec. 2 he is doing. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., the leading critic of Trump's trade policy, issued a statement that night that said, “He is justifying these tariffs by citing Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. This provision is exclusively meant for national security threats. Yet, the President has acknowledged that the real purpose of this action is to combat currency manipulation -- which does not pose a national security threat. Furthermore, even if this action were legitimate, the statutory window for imposing these tariffs has closed. These actions further underscore that Congress should take up my legislation that would reassert congressional authority regarding imposition of national security tariffs.”
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative rightly concludes in its Trade Act Section 301 investigative report Monday (see 191202006) that France’s digital services tax (DST), enacted in July, discriminates against U.S. companies, said tech and business trade associations. USTR seeks comment by Jan. 6 in docket USTR-2019-0009 at regulations.gov on its proposal to slap up to 100 percent retaliatory tariffs on 63 subheadings of French imports worth about $2.4 billion in 2018 customs value, mainly cheese, beauty products, handbags and kitchenware. The French government didn’t comment Tuesday.
TV stations should drop the use of signal blackouts as negotiation tools, a Phoenix Center panel heard Tuesday. Some sought congressional action, which MVPDs have long requested. Broadcasters declined invitations to participate, the organizers said. NAB said that's because the panel was stacked against its industry.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative rightly concludes in its Trade Act Section 301 investigative report Monday (see 191202006) that France’s digital services tax (DST), enacted in July, discriminates against U.S. companies, said tech and business trade associations. USTR seeks comment by Jan. 6 in docket USTR-2019-0009 at regulations.gov on its proposal to slap up to 100 percent retaliatory tariffs on 63 subheadings of French imports worth about $2.4 billion in 2018 customs value, mainly cheese, beauty products, handbags and kitchenware. The French government didn’t comment Tuesday.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative rightly concludes in its Trade Act Section 301 investigative report Monday (see 191202006) that France’s digital services tax (DST), enacted in July, discriminates against U.S. companies, said tech and business trade associations. USTR seeks comment by Jan. 6 in docket USTR-2019-0009 at regulations.gov on its proposal to slap up to 100 percent retaliatory tariffs on 63 subheadings of French imports worth about $2.4 billion in 2018 customs value, mainly cheese, beauty products, handbags and kitchenware. The French government didn’t comment Tuesday.