Nathan Simington was confirmed to the FCC Tuesday after a largely muted Senate floor debate. Senate Democrats and groups opposed to Simington in the lead-up to the vote continued to raise concerns about the 2-2 commission deadlock that will result from his confirmation, once Chairman Ajit Pai leaves Jan. 20 (see 2011300032). Many also cited the FCC’s proposed proceeding on its Communications Decency Act Section 230 interpretation, a matter critics believe Simington should recuse himself from because he worked on NTIA’s petition for the rulemaking (see 2011100070).

Sens. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, are trying to get a bill to increase antitrust enforcer funding added to the Senate Appropriations Committee’s funding bill for FY 2021, Klobuchar told us. The Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act would update those fees for the first time since 2001. When Grassley and Klobuchar introduced the bill in June 2019, they said the fee for a “$900 million deal should not be the same as the fee for a $60 billion deal.”

Sens. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, are trying to get a bill to increase antitrust enforcer funding added to the Senate Appropriations Committee’s funding bill for FY 2021, Klobuchar told us. The Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act would update those fees for the first time since 2001. When Grassley and Klobuchar introduced the bill in June 2019, they said the fee for a “$900 million deal should not be the same as the fee for a $60 billion deal.”

If Communications Decency Act Section 230 is revised with more regulatory burden, it will entrench incumbents and result in more government involvement in communication channels, Parler Chief Policy Officer Amy Peikoff told C-SPAN's The Communicators, scheduled to have been telecast over the weekend. She dismissed concerns about hate speech and hate groups proliferating on Parler, saying the tech industry’s liability shield is working as intended. Her comments followed a Simon Wiesenthal Center report claiming the platform is attracting online extremists and harmful content.

If Communications Decency Act Section 230 is revised with more regulatory burden, it will entrench incumbents and result in more government involvement in communication channels, Parler Chief Policy Officer Amy Peikoff told C-SPAN's The Communicators, scheduled to have been telecast over the weekend. She dismissed concerns about hate speech and hate groups proliferating on Parler, saying the tech industry’s liability shield is working as intended. Her comments followed a Simon Wiesenthal Center report claiming the platform is attracting online extremists and harmful content.

As China continues to gain ground in technology competition with the U.S., Congress should pursue more investment and visa restrictions to prevent China from accessing sensitive U.S. technologies, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission said in a Dec. 1 report. Commissioners said China’s access to U.S. technologies is helping it innovate and export surveillance tools and other advanced technologies globally.

The Wyoming Business Council should "immediately release" coverage maps for broadband network projects funded by Cares Act grants and "halt any funding for projects that will result in subsidized overbuilding," said FCC Commissioner Mike O'Rielly in a letter to Gov. Mark Gordon (R) Wednesday. Local fiber and cable-based broadband providers raised concerns about the duplication of networks in already-serviced areas. O'Rielly said such duplication would "artificially impair the value of" FCC USF subsidies, because at least one of the grants will allegedly overbuild a recipient of Connect America Fund Phase II auction funding. Gordon's office didn't comment Monday.

The Wyoming Business Council should "immediately release" coverage maps for broadband network projects funded by Cares Act grants and "halt any funding for projects that will result in subsidized overbuilding," said FCC Commissioner Mike O'Rielly in a letter to Gov. Mark Gordon (R) Wednesday. Local fiber and cable-based broadband providers raised concerns about the duplication of networks in already-serviced areas. O'Rielly said such duplication would "artificially impair the value of" FCC USF subsidies, because at least one of the grants will allegedly overbuild a recipient of Connect America Fund Phase II auction funding. Gordon's office didn't comment Monday.

The FCC Public Safety Bureau denied ZTE’s petition for reconsideration of the bureau’s June 30 order designating the Chinese telecom equipment maker as a threat to U.S. national security. The order, which also covers Huawei, bars both companies from participating in the USF (see 2007160051). Huawei also sought reversal (see 2007310048). The FCC denied ZTE’s argument that the FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act and the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act (HR-4998) limit “authority to implement a prohibition on USF support for ZTE equipment. ZTE has previously raised this argument and we find no grounds on which to reconsider it here.” The company “does not dispute critical facts underlying” the ban, “and those uncontroverted facts, standing alone, are enough to sustain” it, the bureau said. It reviewed “the totality of the evidence, which included legal and political analysis from Congress and the Executive Branch, Chinese law experts, as well as evidence of security threats provided by allied intelligence services and outside cybersecurity experts.” The bureau “determined that either directly [through] the application of the Chinese National Intelligence Law, or indirectly through the application of political pressure, Chinese companies like ZTE are required to cooperate with intelligence agencies by providing customer information and network traffic information.” It said ZTE “has substantial ties to the Chinese government and its military” apparatus. “We continue to find that vulnerabilities and cybersecurity risks plague ZTE equipment,” the bureau said. It “also took into account ZTE’s record of knowingly violating U.S. law, obstructing U.S. investigations, and making false statements to U.S. authorities even after entering a guilty plea for violating U.S. trade sanctions.” The gearmaker didn’t comment. The denial is “another important step in our ongoing efforts to protect U.S. communications networks from security risks,” said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. He noted plans for commissioners to vote Dec. 10 on rules (see 2011190059) to help U.S. telecom companies replace suspect network equipment proposed in HR-4998. “Now it is more vital than ever that Congress appropriate funds so that our communications networks are protected from vendors that threaten our national security,” Pai said. Lawmakers are pushing to allocate $1.6 billion-$1.8 billion (see 2009140062).

The FCC Public Safety Bureau denied ZTE’s petition for reconsideration of the bureau’s June 30 order designating the Chinese telecom equipment maker as a threat to U.S. national security. The order, which also covers Huawei, bars both companies from participating in the USF (see 2007160051). Huawei also sought reversal (see 2007310048). The FCC denied ZTE’s argument that the FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act and the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act (HR-4998) limit “authority to implement a prohibition on USF support for ZTE equipment. ZTE has previously raised this argument and we find no grounds on which to reconsider it here.” The company “does not dispute critical facts underlying” the ban, “and those uncontroverted facts, standing alone, are enough to sustain” it, the bureau said. It reviewed “the totality of the evidence, which included legal and political analysis from Congress and the Executive Branch, Chinese law experts, as well as evidence of security threats provided by allied intelligence services and outside cybersecurity experts.” The bureau “determined that either directly [through] the application of the Chinese National Intelligence Law, or indirectly through the application of political pressure, Chinese companies like ZTE are required to cooperate with intelligence agencies by providing customer information and network traffic information.” It said ZTE “has substantial ties to the Chinese government and its military” apparatus. “We continue to find that vulnerabilities and cybersecurity risks plague ZTE equipment,” the bureau said. It “also took into account ZTE’s record of knowingly violating U.S. law, obstructing U.S. investigations, and making false statements to U.S. authorities even after entering a guilty plea for violating U.S. trade sanctions.” The gearmaker didn’t comment. The denial is “another important step in our ongoing efforts to protect U.S. communications networks from security risks,” said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. He noted plans for commissioners to vote Dec. 10 on rules (see 2011190059) to help U.S. telecom companies replace suspect network equipment proposed in HR-4998. “Now it is more vital than ever that Congress appropriate funds so that our communications networks are protected from vendors that threaten our national security,” Pai said. Lawmakers are pushing to allocate $1.6 billion-$1.8 billion (see 2009140062).