Russia didn’t offer any “swap” or “concession” in exchange for the U.S. release of Russian cyber hacker Aleksei Burkov in August, FBI Cyber Division Assistant Director Bryan Vorndran told the House Judiciary Committee at a hearing Tuesday. The division can’t comment on the wisdom of the release because it’s the Secret Service’s case, he said.

The 12 GHz band will likely be the subject of the “next big spectrum decision” by the FCC (see 2203210056), New Street’s Blair Levin said in a weekend note to investors. Interference questions are likely to be resolved through an Office of Engineering and Technology analysis of proposals by the 5G for 12 GHz Coalition, he said. “While that Office is sophisticated in keeping to its engineering lane and not trying to make policy, this is the kind of issue on which it is very persuasive with the Commissioners,” he said: “The coalition did submit two engineering studies, one about terrestrial/Direct Broadcast Satellite sharing and the other about terrestrial/non-geostationary Fixed-Satellite Service sharing. Starlink has criticized the studies … but has not offered an engineering study of its own.” Levin said questions remain about the timing of the 2.5 GHz auction, set to start in July (see 2203220066), before the Sept. 30 expiration of FCC auction authority. “The FCC itself has raised questions about whether, after that date, it has authority to issue licenses for an auction, even if the auction commenced before that date,” Levin said: “We think the issue will be resolved to allow the auction and subsequent licensing to proceed but will continue to monitor the situation. A failure for Congress to act could be negative for T-Mobile but positive for its direct competitors.”

Rep. Kevin Brady, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, said that when Republicans meet privately with U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai ahead of her testimony March 30, they will argue that the Section 301 exclusions announced last week (see 2203230070) were far too limited.

ISPs sought minor modifications of the FCC’s 2016 broadband consumer labels as the agency works to create new labels required by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. In reply comments posted Friday in docket 22-2 (see 2203100059), disagreement continued on what details should be included in the labels. Others raised issues with calls to require privacy disclosures in the eventual labels, suggesting links that include more detailed information instead.

There’s renewed focus on the need for Supreme Court interpretation of Communications Decency Act Section 230 after last week’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson. Legislators and 230 watchers, in interviews, cited the likelihood of active litigation finding its way before the Supreme Court, which hasn't reviewed a Section 230 case.

ISPs sought minor modifications of the FCC’s 2016 broadband consumer labels as the agency works to create new labels required by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. In reply comments posted Friday in docket 22-2 (see 2203100059), disagreement continued on what details should be included in the labels. Others raised issues with calls to require privacy disclosures in the eventual labels, suggesting links that include more detailed information instead.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative sought confidential advice from “private-sector advisory committees,” believed to be under the Industry Trade Advisory Committee (ITAC) program managed jointly by USTR and the Commerce Department, before imposing the List 3 Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports, Stephen Vaughn, the agency’s then-general counsel, wrote USTR Robert Lighthizer Sept. 17, 2018. The document was one of about a dozen “decision memos” spanning 488 pages that DOJ filed Thursday in the Section 301 litigation docket (1:21-cv-52) at the U.S. Court of International Trade as an “appendix” to oral argument held there Feb. 1 (see 2202010053).

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative sought confidential advice from “private-sector advisory committees,” believed to be under the Industry Trade Advisory Committee (ITAC) program managed jointly by USTR and the Commerce Department, before imposing the List 3 Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports, Stephen Vaughn, the agency’s then-general counsel, wrote then-USTR Robert Lighthizer on Sept. 17, 2018. The document was one of about a dozen “decision memos” spanning 488 pages that DOJ filed March 24 in the Section 301 litigation docket (In Re Section 301 Cases, CIT #21-00052) at the Court of International Trade as an “appendix” to oral argument held Feb. 1 (see 2202010059).

Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., the top Republican on the House Agriculture subcommittee that covers trade, told Farmers For Free Trade that ag exporters "want China to live up to their commitments, but we don't want to put all our eggs in one basket."

Europe doesn't appear to be looking into communication companies' ties with Russia beyond sanctioning Russia Today and Sputnik, stakeholders said.