The poor could be in danger of losing support for phone service due to shortcomings of the Lifeline national verifier (NV), state commissioners told us this week. NARUC plans to vote at its Feb. 10-13 meeting in Washington on a resolution proposing changes to reduce barriers to accessing Lifeline (see 1901290029). Lifeline providers and a consumer advocate hope the resolution is a wake-up call. The FCC said critics seek to undermine efforts to protect the fund’s integrity.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo wants to codify his net neutrality order in the FY 2020 budget, the Democrat said Wednesday. Cuomo’s 2018 executive order restricted procurement to ISPs that adhere to open-internet rules. “The FCC's dangerous rollback of net neutrality puts corporations over people and goes against our fundamental belief in the free exchange of ideas,” Cuomo said. Such language is in two budget bills, A-2008 and S-1508, and some New York lawmakers proposed separate measures (see 1901230008). The FCC, USTelecom, NCTA and Charter Communications didn’t comment. Challengers to the FCC’s net neutrality reversal made their case to reporters before Friday court oral argument (see 1901300021).

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai's decision to move up a Feb. 21 monthly meeting to Feb. 14 was welcomed, given potential for another shutdown after Feb. 15 (see 1901290014). Pai announced Tuesday the tentative agenda would be the same five drafts originally planned for Wednesday's meeting, now item-less due to the recent shutdown (see 1901230058). Separately, the FCC delayed to Feb. 8 deadlines on many filings due Jan. 8-Feb. 7 (see 1901290043).

Cable and telecom groups sought summary judgment last week in their appeal of Vermont’s net neutrality law and executive order restricting government contracts to companies that follow open-internet principles (see 1812270046). USTelecom, CTIA, NCTA, the American Cable Association and New England Cable and Telecommunications Association asked (in Pacer) U.S. District Court in Burlington to rule “on its first claim for relief seeking a declaratory judgment that the Executive Order and S. 289 are unconstitutional and preempted and a permanent injunction preventing their enforcement.” Industry groups opposed the state’s motion to dismiss as “an unwarranted attempt to forestall the Court’s review of two plainly unconstitutional measures," they responded (in Pacer), "that are preempted by federal law and that violate the dormant Commerce Clause.” Imposing the FCC-repealed internet conduct standard “imposes significant harms on ISPs” by regulatory uncertainty, they said.

Consumer advocates challenging an FCC wireline streamlining order urged the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reject the attempt "to avoid" their substantive argument by disputing their legal standing (see 1812030047). "Plaintiffs may establish [constitutional] standing as consumers of wireline services," replied (in Pacer) several groups Tuesday in Greenlining Institute v. FCC, No. 17-73283. "The harm is clear and the way in which the judicial decision remedies the harm is clear." The Greenlining Institute, Public Knowledge, The Utility Reform Network and National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates said they're "adversely affected" by the November 2017 order that relaxed telco requirements to provide copper retirement notifications and gain telecom service discontinuance approvals (see 1711160032). They said the FCC, DOJ and intervenor USTelecom renewed arguments previously rejected by a motions panel (without prejudice): "Even if the Court decides to give the Commission the benefit of the doubt that it did not treat this proceeding as merely a box to check before issuing a predetermined conclusion, the manifold failings and errors of the Order on Review cannot be defended."

Net neutrality bills are attempting comebacks in states that blocked measures last year, with lawmakers in more than a dozen states introducing net neutrality bills this month. States “have significantly more experience with the issue” after California enacted a strong bill and about 35 states at least proposed a measure last year, said New America Open Technology Institute Policy Counsel Eric Null. Pending legal challenges against the FCC and states could slow legislative momentum, some said. Federal legislators might try to preempt state actions (see 1901230046).

The House Communications Subcommittee is aiming to hold its first net neutrality hearing during the first two weeks of February, Chairman Mike Doyle, D-Pa., told reporters Tuesday. Some Republicans are interested in exploring legislation that would be patterned on existing state-level net neutrality actions, to forestall potential Democratic legislation that would aim to reinstate FCC 2015 rules. Entities that lobbied on net neutrality in Q4 decreased from the same period in 2017.

Sprint and Twitter reported significant increases in their Q4 lobbying spending at our deadline Tuesday, while Qualcomm said its expenditures dropped slightly from the same period a year earlier. Many other tech and telecom stakeholders hadn't yet reported their own spending figures, but some outside lobbyists reported receiving fees from them. The deadline to file lobbying spending reports for Q4 was Tuesday.

Senate Communications Subcommittee Chairman John Thune, R-S.D., and Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., refiled their Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (Traced) Act Thursday to combat illegal robocall scams. S-151, originally filed in November, would increase FCC authority, allowing the agency to levy civil penalties of up to $10,000 per call when the caller intentionally flouts the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The bill would extend to three years the window for civil enforcement. The agency also would be required to begin a rulemaking to help protect subscribers from receiving unwanted calls or texts from callers using unauthenticated numbers. S-151 would require carriers to adopt call authentication technologies that allow them to verify an incoming call is legitimate. The legislation “holds those people who participate in robocall scams and intentionally violate telemarketing laws accountable and does more to proactively protect consumers who are potential victims,” Thune said. “To address the scourge of calls, we need a simple formula: call authentication, blocking, and enforcement, and this legislation achieves all three,” Markey said. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr tweeted his praise for the senators' “leadership in helping to crack down on illegal robocalls that not only interrupt our daily lives but seek to defraud millions of Americans. Their bill addresses an issue that leads all consumer complaints at the FCC each year.” Many stakeholders lauded the bill, including AT&T, Consumer Federation of America and other consumer groups and associations, CTIA, NTCA, USTelecom and Verizon.

Votes planned for a Jan. 30 FCC meeting are at risk as the partial government shutdown drags on with no end in sight, agency observers said. Even if lawmakers jump-start negotiations and reopen FCC offices before Jan. 30, time is slipping away for deliberations and votes by officials who would be scrambling to play catch-up and address backlogs. Another complication is the looming addition of Commissioner Geoffrey Starks, who hasn't been sworn in despite being confirmed (see 901170036).