Industry groups met virtually with staff from the FCC Public Safety Bureau on recent work by the Cross-Sector Resiliency Forum. “Recently, over 40 member companies … reconvened to look back at 2022 and review the efforts of communications providers and electric companies to respond to disaster events, including wildfires and hurricanes (Hurricane Ian, in particular), as well as opportunities to enhance our coordination and collaborative efforts in future disaster events,” said a filing posted Wednesday in docket 11-60. They discussed early activation of and coordination for Hurricane Ian, among other topics, the filing said: “In the days before landfall of Hurricane Ian, relevant state and cross-sector counterparts began communication and coordination efforts, including establishing a cadence of reporting and conference calls. After landfall, there were daily ‘wires down’ and make safe calls between electric and communications companies in hard hit areas, like Lee County, Florida.” The forum is looking for other ways to improve coordination. “For example, federal and state governments can enhance recovery and response by improving the process for distributing access letters that enable electric and communications company teams to enter disaster areas,” the groups said. “Aligning state processes (i.e., rules of the road) is important to expedite response and recovery.” They urged wider distribution of the FCC’s notices about avoiding fiber cuts. Attending the meeting were representatives of CTIA, the Edison Electric Institute, NCTA and USTelecom.

Reply comments largely tracked initial comments on an FCC NPRM on proposed rules for making the emergency alert system and wireless emergency alerts more secure (see 2212270048). FCC commissioners approved an NPRM 4-0 in October (see 2210270058). Replies were due Monday in docket 15-94. “As demonstrated throughout the record, the Commission should not adopt the cybersecurity proposals in the NPRM,” said CTIA: Participating carriers “implement WEA-specific technical standards and have robust cyber risk management plans that cover WEA operations, making the proposed certification requirement unnecessary.” The Competitive Carriers Association agreed with CTIA that the record is clear. “Instead, the Commission should promote the success and security of the WEA program in other ways including through collaborative multistakeholder security improvement processes,” CCA said: “Imposition of onerous new regulatory burdens that make WEA less flexible, more difficult, and disproportionately more costly for smaller and regional carriers to administer may potentially undermine participation in the WEA program.” USTelecom also urged a light-handed approach by the FCC. “Rather than create a new regime, the Commission should find ways to achieve its goals within the context of a harmonized, whole-of-government approach, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and other government partners, as well as industry,” USTelecom said. The group noted CISA is already looking at when incidents should have to be reported: “Additional requirements, at this time, before the dust has settled, risk further fragmenting reporting requirements across the federal government, frustrating the Commission’s interest in working with its federal partners.” Opposition wasn't unanimous. The FCC won’t impose a significant burden on providers by requiring annual security certifications, said the Center for Internet Security. “The required risk management plan consists of nothing more than implementing [security standards] in a timely manner as part of normal operations,” the center said: “There is essentially no cost associated with implementing these controls, and a requirement for annual self-certification to the FCC would likely involve at most an on-line submission or completion of a two-page template with check-off boxes.” Broadcasters and cable companies also raised concerns. “It is imperative … that any changes to the EAS rules are proportionate to the needs of the EAS ecosystem and consistent with evolutions in broadcast infrastructure,” said Gray Television: “Gray shares the concern of several commenters that many of the proposals in the NPRM are not justified and could prove counter-productive by imposing unnecessarily burdensome obligations on broadcasters. At the same time, Gray wholeheartedly endorses the proposal of the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) to permit EAS Participants to virtualize certain elements of their EAS operations.” As comments show, “the Commission should take care when creating any new EAS monitoring or reporting requirements to ensure that the new rules are clearly necessary and that EAS Participants continue to have sufficient time to evaluate any potential issues regarding failure of, or unauthorized access to, their EAS system and facilities,” said Altice USA: “Any new rules also should allow the greatest possible flexibility in cybersecurity policies and practices so that Participants can tailor them to the unique needs of their networks.”

Industry continued to urge the FCC to help facilitate the transition to fully IP-networks and Stir/Shaken caller ID authentication. In reply comments posted Tuesday in docket 17-97 (see 2212130065), some disagreed whether the transition should be mandated and how to treat existing non-IP networks.

Industry groups asked the FCC to either clarify or reconsider parts of rules for the commission's consumer broadband labels. Some in comments posted Wednesday in docket 22-2 expressed concerns about the types of services and details required in the labels. Commissioners adopted the new labels in November, largely mirroring those established in 2016 (see 2211180077).

Procedural concerns could complicate a case at the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a New York law requiring affordable broadband. At oral argument Thursday in Manhattan, Judge Richard Sullivan grilled parties on a procedural maneuver they used to move the case to the 2nd Circuit from the trial court. Sullivan asked New York’s attorney tough questions on the state’s argument that its law isn’t preempted.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel wants improved ability to route calls and texts made to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline to local call centers (see 2207150036), but mental health and emergency management stakeholders say more enhanced capabilities to know exactly where calls are being placed from could be complicated by a sizable policy split in the mental health community on privacy.

The FCC Wireline Bureau extended by 12 days the deadline to submit reply comments to a notice of inquiry on caller ID authentication for non-IP networks (see 2212130065). The Cloud Communications Alliance, NCTA, NTCA, USTelecom, Voice on the Net Coalition and WTA sought an extension. Replies are now due Jan. 23 in docket 17-97, said an order Thursday.

USTelecom promotes Paul Eisler to vice president-cybersecurity and innovation … Incompas announces 2023-2024 board, including new member Tristar License Group Vice President Owen Mayfield … Montana Public Service Commission elects Jennifer Fielder (R) vice president, succeeding term-limited Commissioner Brad Johnson (R), and adds physician Ann Bukacek (R) to commission.

USTelecom asked Congress to "stay closely engaged" with the Biden administration and states to ensure broadband funding from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act results in "maximum program effectiveness," in a letter Tuesday. The group is seeking legislation to "help ensure timely infrastructure permitting" and "appropriate oversight" of grant recipients. It also asked that the FCC's affordable connectivity program be made permanent: "While most customers enjoy faster speeds and lower broadband prices, those struggling financially need additional assistance." Congress should work with the FCC to expand the contribution base for the USF, USTelecom added, noting edge providers and platforms are "the greatest beneficiaries of high-speed networks." The group also sought action on public-private cybersecurity partnerships, privacy protections and eliminating the tax on federal broadband grants.

USTelecom representatives met with an aide to FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel to support the FCC's 2020 order on unbundled network elements rules and oppose a petition by Sonic Telecom seeking reconsideration (see 2210170079). “The Commission correctly recognized that in light of the passage of time and changed marketplace conditions, it should reexamine its unbundling requirements,” said a filing posted Friday in docket 19-308. The FCC “applied the law faithfully by evaluating what unbundling requirements are appropriate in the modern marketplace based on the impairment standard and by forbearing where the statutory test was satisfied,” USTelecom said, noting it “advocated for forbearing from all unbundling obligations, but negotiated a compromise” with Incompas and “nearly every interested competitive LEC and incumbent LEC in this docket.” The commission “has a long history of relying on negotiated agreements,” the group said.