DENVER -- Industry voices and regulators both state and federal wrestled this week with the principles NARUC has begun to articulate as part of its telecom task force on federalism. President Philip Jones formed the group last November, and its members have produced two drafts of principles facing two rounds of comments so far. Stakeholders’ responses split, some praising the tentative principles of collaboration the task force advanced, while others suggested it misses the mark in its definition of communication and stances on such controversial topics as interconnection between Internet Protocol-enabled service providers. One goal of Wednesday’s NARUC sessions in Denver was to directly engage stakeholders that commented critically on the latest draft paper, task force member Chris Nelson, vice chairman of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, told us last week (CD July 22 p18).

Remote peering could extend the life and value of peering and peering exchange points, said DrPeering International Executive Director William Norton in a Tuesday webinar sponsored by USTelecom. Norton said as the price of purchasing transit continues to fall, traditional peering has made less and less economic sense for companies focused on minimizing the cost of sending traffic to customers, since transit is an alternative to peering. But since remote peering can eliminate colocation costs, capital expenses and operational expenses associated with traditional peering at exchange points, it offers an alternative to traditional peering that could convince more companies to engage in peering. Remote peering can be deployed more quickly and less expensively, which could increase the amount of existing peers, increase the traffic available through peered connections, and make public exchange points more valuable, he said. One international company peering in Europe was able to save $1.1 million in capital expenditures and $15,000 per month in operational expenditures by choosing remote over traditional peering, he said. “It’s a new technology, but it’s being rapidly adopted by the masses.”

Q2 lobbying disclosure filings showed T-Mobile and Sprint continued to increase their spending versus the same period a year prior, according to documents filed Tuesday. T-Mobile spent $1.4 million, an 18 percent bump, while the former Sprint Nextel spent $650,000, 17 percent more than the same period last year. AT&T spent $3.74 million, a 7 percent increase from the same quarter a year ago. Verizon lobbying spend decreased 17 percent to $3.27 million. CTIA lobbying fell by nearly 21 percent to $1.89 million. USTelecom spent $1.3 million last quarter, a decrease of 6.5 percent. NTCA spent $270,000 in the second quarter, up nearly 23 percent. Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance Q2 lobbying spending decreased 44 percent to $19,000. The Telecommunications Industry Association spent $50,000, nearly 62 percent less on Q2 lobbying than one year ago. The Competitive Carriers Association spent $120,000 in Q2, a 14 percent increase. Netflix lobbying spending was up 122 percent in Q2 to $300,000. Comcast increased Q2 lobbying spending by 37 percent to $5.47 million. Dish Network spent $360,000, a 20 percent increase. NAB spent $3.19 million last quarter, a drop of nearly 3 percent. NCTA lobbying spending increased 2 percent to $4.66 million, while CEA lobbying spending jumped 34 percent to $1.1 million. CompTel spent $126,000, a nearly 10 percent drop. Facebook increased its Q2 lobbying spending by 10 percent to $1.06 million. Yahoo’s lobbying spending decreased 1 percent to $720,000. Intel spent $730,000, a 15 percent decrease from the same period a year before. The Recording Industry Association of America spent $1.25 million, a 6 percent increase.

July 21-24 NARUC summer meetings, Sheraton Denver Downtown -- http://bit.ly/123Joc5

Changing dynamics in Washington may influence the balance of federalism, multiple state utility commissioners told us. Commissioners from around the country will gather in Denver Sunday through Wednesday for NARUC’s summer meeting and will address questions of state-federal relations as part of NARUC’s Task Force on Telecom and Federalism and in policy debates. The state role remains critical, said the commissioners, stressing evolving technologies and consumer protections after years of what some consider federal and industry overreach. The five draft telecom resolutions being considered also speak to these changes, they said.

NCTA was among the 50 industry trade associations and public interest groups that urged House and Senate leaders in a letter Wednesday to pass legislation meant to address the problem of “patent trolls.” The number of defendants facing patent infringement lawsuits brought by patent trolls has quadrupled since 2005 and patent trolls’ activity cost the U.S. economy $80 billion in 2011, the groups said in the letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., have been seeking “comprehensive legislative solutions” through their committees, while individual members of Congress have introduced their own bills aimed at addressing the effects of patent trolls; the White House’s executive actions, mainly directed at addressing the problem through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and related legislative recommendations are also an encouraging step, the groups said. Other industry groups that signed onto the letter: the Application Developers Alliance, Association of National Advertisers, Competitive Carriers Association, CompTel, Computer and Communications Industry Association, the CEA, Direct Marketing Association, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Engine Advocacy, Information Technology Industry Council, Internet Association, Internet Infrastructure Association, MPAA, NAB, NCTA, NTCA, Online Publishers Association, Public Knowledge, the Software & Information Industry Association, TechAmerica, TechNet and USTelecom (http://bit.ly/12TfZ1M).

House Republicans and Democrats again delved into the acrimonious topic of FCC reform Thursday at a House Communications Subcommittee hearing. Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., said there’s a real need to improve the transparency and accountability of the FCC and stumped for two draft bills similar to FCC reform legislation (HR-3310, HR-3309) that failed to advance last session (CD March 27/12 p1). Commerce Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Subcommittee Ranking Member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., bemoaned the draft bills, which they said would slow FCC processes and subject the commission to special rules and more litigation.

Congress should seek to limit telemarketing exemptions and permit enforcement officials to pursue third-party spoofing providers, FTC and FCC officials said at a hearing Wednesday of the Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Insurance. The prevalence of call spoofing, the practice of displaying false phone numbers on caller ID displays, remains a big hurdle for enforcement officials, witnesses said. Subcommittee Chair Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., railed against the increase in robocall complaints and said “these shady companies … remain a serious annoyance and abuse to consumers.”

The latest draft of principles from the NARUC telecom task force still raised questions of overreach and appropriate balance regarding the role of states. Other stakeholders praised the draft and underscored the duties states should still have. The group, formed in late November and preparing a white paper for November 2013, released this draft last month (CD June 11 p13), to be discussed at NARUC’s Denver meeting in late July.

Comments are due July 31 on an FCC proposal to “streamline or eliminate legacy regulations contained in the Computer Inquiry proceedings,” said a public notice released Wednesday (http://bit.ly/1aD9NTy). Reply comments will be due Aug. 30 in docket 95-20. The FNPRM was released along with an order partially granting USTelecom’s petition for forbearance from several rules and requirements (CD May 20 p9).