Many stakeholders backed hiking USF rural health care program funding support, while industry parties focused more on improving RHC efficiency and oversight. Dozens of comments were filed at the FCC Monday and last week in docket 17-310 on an NPRM on possibly increasing the program's $400 million annual cap and creating a prioritization mechanism if demand exceeds the cap, among other potential changes. The Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition urged increasing the cap to $800 million to reflect that potential participating providers more than doubled since 1997 when the current cap began. The American Hospital Association said the cap should be "significantly increased to keep pace with growing connectivity demand." Other healthcare interests and Alaskan entities, including tribal groups, backed an increase, citing the need to at least account for inflation. The NPRM "overlooks the significantly greater need for support on a per-location basis in Alaska's rural areas than in the rest of the nation," said Alaska Communications. USTelecom shared some FCC concerns with how the RHC program has operated in the lower 48 states, where "cases of waste, fraud, or abuse have come to light." The commission should focus on helping Universal Service Administrative Co. "detect and reject applications where federal universal service support is not needed" to meet statutory proposes, the telco group said. NCTA supported the promotion of telehealth in rural America "based on evidentiary data with a principal focus on defined needs and desired outcomes." NTCA said the FCC should provide better guidance to applicants, including on the specificity needed to describe requests for service support. "Ensure that satellite broadband services are eligible to equitably compete" for such money, said the Satellite Industry Association.

Telecom groups said the FCC should narrow its definition of "continuing violations" of rules to exclude four types of infractions. Noting a petition to reconsider a decision setting treble damages for rule violations on payments to USF and other funding programs, CTIA, Incompas, NCTA and USTelecom said the agency's definition "is inconsistent with the one-year statute of limitations for non-broadcast Notices of Apparent Liability ('NALs') contained in the Communications Act" and with court precedent. The one-year statute of limitations "is intended to create 'repose' and does not continue because the violation either has not been 'cured' or has continuing effects," said their filing Wednesday in docket 16-330 on a meeting with Enforcement Bureau Chief Rosemary Harold and other staffers. They said continuing violations shouldn't include: "(1) failure to make (or timely make) a required regulatory filing; (2) the inclusion of incorrect information in a regulatory filing; (3) failure to make (or timely make) a required [USF] or other regulatory payment; and (4) failure to return improperly received funds to the USF or other FCC funds." They noted then-Commissioner Ajit Pai voiced views "consistent with our position" in NAL dissents after their petition.

The FCC acted to pave the way for a Connect America Fund reverse auction, starting July 24, of $1.98 billion in subsidies over 10 years for fixed broadband and voice services. Commissioners unanimously approved orders on remaining policy issues and a public notice on application and bidding procedures for the CAF Phase II auction targeting high-cost areas traditionally served by larger telcos. Commissioner Mike O'Rielly partially concurred on the orders and Commissioner Mignon Clyburn partially concurred on the PN.

House Communications Subcommittee members clashed during a Tuesday hearing over the process for building a potential broadband title in coming infrastructure legislation, hours before President Donald Trump was expected to highlight his infrastructure proposal in his State of the Union. Trump has been expected for weeks to mention infrastructure there (see 1801170054). The House Communications hearing focused on 25 separate bills, including more than a dozen subcommittee bills that Republicans filed in recent weeks and several Democratic-led or bipartisan measures (see 1801110058, 1801160048, 1801170055, 1801180058 and 1801190048).

Comcast hires from Liberty Global's Virgin Media Dana Strong as president-consumer services ... Equinix says CEO-board member Steve Smith resigns "after exercising poor judgment with respect to an employee matter," and board, accepting his resignation, names Executive Chairman Peter Van Camp interim CEO; he previously was CEO ... President Donald Trump is naming Suzette Kuhlow Kent, EY, administrator, Office of Electronic Government, Office of Management and Budget.

A House Communications Subcommittee hearing Tuesday on closing the digital divide with broadband solutions is scheduled to have seven witnesses: Jonathan Spalter, USTelecom CEO; Brad Gillen, CTIA executive vice president; Matthew Polka, American Cable Association CEO; Shirley Bloomfield, NTCA CEO; Scott Slesinger, National Resources Defense Council legislative director; Joanne Hovis, CTC technology and energy president; and Elin Swanson Katz, Connecticut consumer counsel. The hearing webpage cited 22 bills and resolutions aimed at promoting high-speed network deployment. "Expanding broadband infrastructure to the approximately 23 million Americans who lack sufficient access is a top priority," said subcommittee Chairman Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., recently. "We are taking steps in the right direction with this legislative hearing, as the bills up for discussion will bring us closer to bridging the digital divide."

The Department of Homeland Security's National Protection and Programs Directorate is aiming to tweak its Automated Indicator Sharing (AIS) program in the coming months in a bid to improve the quality of cybersecurity information the department sends to the private sector, said DHS Assistant Secretary-NPPD Office of Cybersecurity and Communications (OCC) Jeanette Manfra during a Thursday USTelecom event. The 2015 Cybersecurity Act, which made DHS the main civilian portal for cyber information sharing, directed the department to create AIS as its main civilian cybersecurity information sharing portal (see 1512180052).

The FCC received wide and nuanced input on ways to ensure or facilitate unblocking of calls erroneously blocked by anti-robocalling measures. Many urged mandatory challenge mechanisms or other new rules to speed unblocking of legitimate calls, while others resisted potential regulations. More comments were posted Tuesday and Wednesday in docket 17-59 on a November Further NPRM attached to an order encouraging providers to block illegal calls. Previous comments mostly expressed skepticism about unblocking regulation (see 1801230062). Noting a 2015 order authorizing consumer-initiated call blocking, collections group ACA International said the FCC should adopt "call blocking mitigation mechanisms that apply both to provider-initiated and consumer-initiated call blocking." The Professional Association for Customer Equipment, Alorica and the Consumer Relations Consortium urged the FCC to require carriers to offer call-blocking mitigation services for call originators and recipients, along with speedy agency complaint procedures. The Electronic Transactions Association backed an FCC challenge mechanism if it promotes "centralized feedback" as part of an industry standard. Hiya backed a challenge mechanism and the Retail Energy Supply Association urged numerous new FCC requirements. SiriusXM said it's being harmed by aggressive blocking of legal calls and proposed various rules to facilitate unblocking. NTCA said providers that block calls should be required to send callers with blocked numbers an "intercept message" notifying them of the action and possible remedial steps. Consumer groups don't oppose an unblocking mechanism if there are safeguards but sought new FCC actions to combat illegal robocalling. The National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions also urged the FCC to stay focused on cracking down on unlawful robocalls, and wait to undo harmful effects until litigation over the 2015 order is resolved. Colonial Penn Life Insurance backed the FCC initiative if it acts to ensure legitimate marketers aren't snared. USTelecom opposed a challenge-mechanism requirement and asked the FCC to back industry-led unblocking efforts. Verizon said the FCC should encourage industry efforts, saying much depends on whether blocking is opt-in or opt-out. NCTA said the FCC should monitor voluntary call blocking before deciding on new rules. Comcast opposed possible new reporting duties but suggested the FCC require voice providers to create their own user-friendly webpages for reporting erroneous call blocking. First Orion said industry parties need leeway to develop their own challenge mechanisms, and Transaction Network Services suggested a challenge mechanism is tricky to implement. ITTA opposed possible new industry reporting duties for voice providers. Incompas asked to hold off on such obligations for now, and "not rush to implement any solutions" that could harm upstart competitors until reliable robocall detection is available industrywide.

AT&T's proposal for Congress to pursue an “Internet Bill of Rights” on net neutrality that “applies to all internet companies” drew swift condemnation Wednesday from the Internet Association and praise from several communications sector groups. “End the debate once and for all, by writing new laws that govern the internet and protect consumers,” said AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson in an open letter. “Legislation would not only ensure consumers’ rights are protected, but it would provide consistent rules of the road for all internet companies across all websites, content, devices and applications. In the very near future, technological advances like self-driving cars, remote surgery and augmented reality will demand even greater performance from the internet. Without predictable rules for how the internet works, it will be difficult to meet the demands of these new technology advances.” AT&T is running such advertisements. “It is impossible to believe that AT&T is serious when they have such a long track record opposing consumer protections like net neutrality,” an IA spokesman emailed. “IA and our members support” planned Congressional Review Act resolution of disapproval aimed at undoing the FCC's order to rescind its 2015 net neutrality rules and that has support of all 49 Democratic senators and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. “We support strong, enforceable net neutrality rules, which were consumer protections on the books until AT&T and their allies had their way” via the FCC rescission order, the IA spokesman said. USTelecom CEO Jonathan Spalter lauded AT&T's proposal “and encourage[d] our Congressional leaders to work together to enshrine net neutrality principles into law.” The Internet Innovation Alliance said it has “long advocated for Congressional legislation that would make permanent the core principles of an open Internet. Only Congress can craft a unified regulatory framework that would apply to all entities in the Internet ecosystem and provide the nation’s consumers and businesses with the online protections they deserve.”

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine will propose net neutrality legislation to the D.C. Council, an AG office official said Wednesday at a Council Government Operations Committee roundtable on a resolution condemning the FCC’s December decision to rescind Communications Act Title II protections. D.C. interim Chief Technology Officer Barney Krucoff and Public Service Commission Chairman Betty Ann Kane also supported the resolution, though Kane noted the PSC can’t regulate broadband internet access service (BIAS) providers or the internet.