The Biden administration’s upcoming outbound investment screening rules should restrict both private and public investments, starting with “five to six priority sectors” but eventually expanding to more, said Rep. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin, the top Republican on the House Select Committee on China. Gallagher said the rules should stop Americans from investing in Chinese entities connected to the country’s military, human rights abuses or “technological rise,” should require Chinese companies to meet the same due diligence standards as U.S. firms, and shouldn't be adjudicated through a case-by-case process, which would cause uncertainty for American investors.

House Republicans this week urged the Biden administration not to strike a deal with Beijing after Chinese officials reportedly offered to restart counter-narcotics activities with the U.S. in exchange for lifting certain trade restrictions. Beijing asked the U.S. to lift restrictions on the Ministry of Public Security’s Institute of Forensic Science, The Wall Street Journal recently reported. The institute was added to the Entity List in 2020 for its ties to human rights violations.

Two U.S. semiconductor companies said they still see opportunities to sell into the Chinese market despite sweeping export controls announced by the U.S. in October (see 2210070049) and potentially more restrictions coming soon.

Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

The top lawmakers on the House Select Committee on China urged the Commerce Department to strengthen its Oct. 7 China chip controls, saying Chinese firms have “identified workarounds.” In a letter last week to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, Reps. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., and Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., said the interim final rule’s threshold for the “bidirectional transfer rate of 600 Gbyte/s should be lowered sufficiently to prevent clever engineering that bypasses the regulations.” They also said the rule, which will be updated in the coming months when finalized by the Bureau of Industry and Security (see 2307260071), should address Chinese firms using cloud computing services to “outsource their advanced computing needs” and evade the export controls (see 2303210037 and 2305160092).

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in a July opinion, reversed a California district court's decision acquitting Yi-Chi Shih, an employee at China-based firm Chengdu RML, of conspiracy to violate export control laws via his export of semiconductors to China. Judges Andrew Hurwitz and Ryan Nelson said "a rational factfinder could find that the exported [monolithic microwave integrated circuits] were not exempt from the [Export Administration Regulations] as fundamental research."

The Semiconductor Industry Association this week released a report on the state of the American chip industry, highlighting issues surrounding U.S. Chips Act implementation, the manufacturing industrial base, global chip demand, American technological competitiveness, geopolitical tensions impacting the industry and more.

The Bureau of Industry and Security shouldn’t renew the one-year authorizations it gave to certain foreign chip companies as part of its Oct. 7 China chip controls unless the agency makes “significant” changes to the restrictions when it finalizes the controls in the coming months, said Derek Scissors, a China policy expert with the American Enterprise Institute. Scissors said extending the licenses beyond their October expiration would “undermine” the Biden administration’s goal of denying China advanced semiconductor technology and unfairly advantage foreign companies over U.S. firms.

The Commerce and Defense departments this week signed a memorandum of understanding to improve collaboration on their efforts to strengthen the American semiconductor defense industrial base, including through Chips Act funding. The memorandum will increase information sharing between the two agencies, including by allowing officials to coordinate on national security reviews of Chips Act funding applications, Chips Program Office Director Michael Schmidt said. Laura Taylor-Kale, assistant secretary of defense for industrial base policy, said it’s “essential for DoD and DoC to consult one another to ensure we are making complementary investments that support a robust semiconductor industrial base.”

The Senate this week voted to attach amendments to its version of the FY 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, including one that could establish a notification regime for certain outbound investments and another that could ban China, Russia, North Korea and Iran from investing in American farmland and agricultural businesses.