Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The Group of 7 countries likely will discuss sanctions, trade and a host of other issues at the upcoming summit in Japan, but the most consequential topic may surround the group’s emerging “de-risking” policy toward China, experts said this week. Several said they expect the G-7 countries to end the summit by releasing more information on the approach, although they also noted that not all Europeans yet agree with the strategy.
The chairman of the powerful House Rules Committee used his perch to promote a bill he sponsored that would allow the president to lower duties on non-import-sensitive goods made by a country that lost exports due to coercive actions; increase duties on imports from the "foreign adversary" committing the coercion; and allow the U.S. to more easily facilitate trade, including exports, with the coerced parties (see 2302230021).
The Bureau of Industry and Security needs much more funding to carry out its export control work, lawmakers and former officials said during a House hearing this week. Kevin Wolf, a former senior official at BIS, said Congress should consider doubling -- perhaps quadrupling -- the agency’s resources.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers this week reintroduced a bill that could establish an outbound investment screening regime to prevent China and others from illegally acquiring sensitive U.S. technology.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The EU is considering new sanctions on Chinese companies for supporting Russia’s military, the Financial Times reported May 7. The sanctions, which are expected to be discussed by EU member states this week, could target seven Chinese companies for selling equipment to Moscow that could be used in weapons, the report said. The list of companies reportedly includes two companies from mainland China, 3HC Semiconductors and King-Pai Technology, and five based in Hong Kong: Sinno Electronics, Sigma Technology, Asia Pacific Links, Tordan Industry and Alpha Trading Investments. Some of the companies are already subject to U.S. restrictions, including 3HC, which was added to the Commerce Department's Entity List in April for supplying Russia's military (see 2304120039). All EU member states would have to agree to the new measures before they take effect.
Although Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company last year secured a one-year authorization to continue certain China-related activities despite the Commerce Department’s October chip controls, the company has “no assurance that we will be able to continue securing such general authorization on a timely basis or at all,” it said in an April Securities and Exchange Commission filing. The Bureau of Industry and Security recently said it’s working with some companies to allow them to continue certain activities authorized by the waivers after they expire (see 2302240008).
U.S. export controls and investment restrictions can successfully maintain America’s lead over China in sensitive technologies, including semiconductors, said Michele Flournoy, a former Defense Department official. But she also warned against policies that could push the U.S. toward decoupling from Beijing, saying the government needs to do a better job working with industry to craft the restrictions.
Governments globally should “proceed carefully” when considering new trade restrictions on per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to avoid “unduly” restricting current semiconductor innovation, the Semiconductor Industry Association said last week. The group said PFAS “are used in a wide range of industrial processes and consumer products,” and although some may present “environmental and health concerns,” governments should avoid controlling uses of the substances that may not present health and environmental risks.