Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The U.S. should launch a new office within the Bureau of Industry and Security to measure the intended and unintended impacts of export controls on global supply chains before they are implemented, technology policy experts said in a new Atlantic Council report this week. This could help the U.S. better calibrate its trade restrictions so they don’t alienate allies and hurt American competitiveness, the report said, and could ultimately better convince trade partners to join in on the controls.
Chip company ASML Netherlands may refuse job applicants who may not be able to comply with U.S. export regulations, an independent Netherlands human rights monitor ruled this month, saying the refusal doesn't violate Dutch anti-discrimination laws. The monitor said ASML is justified in not hiring applicants from certain countries to positions where they could access U.S.-controlled dual-use technologies, according to an unofficial translation of the judgment, otherwise ASML could face “major risks of sanctions” from the U.S.
The EU is preparing to revamp its dual-use export control regime to better target emerging technologies, said Jean-Charles van Eeckhaute, a senior European Commission official. Van Eeckhaute said the commission already has begun work on a new list of dual-use technologies -- which the bloc hopes to finalize by September -- that may warrant new restrictions.
The EU levied its 11th sanctions package against Russia June 23, imposing a host of new export restrictions, individual designations and "new tools to counter circumvention and information warfare," the European Council announced. The new designations target 71 people and 33 entities involved in military activities, political decision-making, the spread of disinformation, the forced adoption of Ukrainian children to Russia and Russian information technology companies offering technology to Russian intelligence agencies.
Many companies are grappling with how best to comply with the Commerce Department’s foreign direct product rule, “one of the key areas” still “unaddressed” by the agency’s regulations and guidance, said Kim Strosnider, a trade lawyer with Covington. She said Commerce’s compliance expectations for the FDP rule are rising despite due diligence challenges faced by industry, pointing to the agency’s record $300 million penalty against Seagate Technology in April (see 2305080029 and 2304190071).
China’s recent restrictions on Micron products are having broader than expected consequences for U.S. exporters, a trade industry conference heard last week, and may portend how future Chinese retaliatory actions will affect U.S. companies.
The EU this week released an economic security strategy, detailing plans to improve export controls over sensitive technologies and study whether it needs better guardrails around inbound investments and new restrictions around outbound investments. The strategy could lead to new proposals surrounding export controls and investment restrictions by the end of the year.
The Bureau of Industry and Security is working “day-in and day-out” on a final rule that will make tweaks to its China-related chip export controls released in October (see 2210070049), said BIS Senior Export Policy Analyst Sharron Cook. But a public release of the rule isn’t imminent -- the agency hasn’t yet sent the changes to be reviewed by other agencies, said Hillary Hess, regulatory policy director at BIS.
Even as Europe comes to see China as a systemic rival, the entanglement of the German and Chinese economies continues unabated, and what "de-risking" should look like is hotly contested, witnesses told the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission at a hearing late last week.