U.S. policymakers should explore new ways to restrict transfers of items and services that China may be using to advance its artificial intelligence capabilities, such as data, algorithms and human capital, the Center for a New American Security said in a report this week. Although the administration should “aggressively” restrict exports to China of advanced semiconductor equipment, the report said Washington also needs to “seek out creative tools to regulate other basic building blocks of AI.”

A former U.S. trade representative and treasury secretary this week cautioned the Biden administration as it prepares to introduce a new outbound investment screening regime, saying new authorities like these tend to expand over time and could eventually be used beyond their intended purpose.

The Biden administration will complete its review of the Section 301 tariffs "this fall," U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai wrote to senators, and while she did not commit to any course of action, she wrote: "As part of the 4-Year Review of the Section 301 tariffs, USTR is reviewing the effectiveness of the tariffs in achieving the objectives of the investigation, as well as the effect of the tariffs on consumers, workers, and the U.S. economy at large. As part of this review, we are considering the existing tariffs structure and how to make the tariffs more strategic in light of impacts on sectors of the U.S. economy as well [as] the goal of increasing domestic manufacturing."

The House Select Committee on China this week sent letters to four U.S. venture capital firms about their investments in Chinese artificial intelligence and semiconductor companies, saying those investments may be helping Beijing “perpetrate human rights abuses and enhance its military capabilities.” The letters, sent to GGV Capital, GSR Ventures, Qualcomm Ventures and Walden International, also seek information about any of their potential investments in China’s quantum industry, how the companies decide which Chinese firms to invest in, how they respond if a company they invest in is added to the Commerce Department’s Entity List and more.

The U.S. this week sanctioned more than 100 people, entities and ships supporting Russia’s war efforts against Ukraine, including one of its top metals producers and leading construction companies, Kyrgyz Republic firms sending Moscow dual-use technologies, and other businesses helping the government evade international sanctions. The new designations are meant to further restrict Russia’s ability to import military goods and technology, slash revenue from its mining sector, undermine its energy capabilities and “degrade Russia’s access to the international financial system,” the Treasury Department said.

A former senior export control official with the Commerce Department told the House Select Committee on China that he thinks the Entity List is ineffective against China, because countries can change their names, establish partnerships, change locations, and because the Entity List is a "meat cleaver" approach, given that listed parties are subject to very strict licensing requirements.

Republicans on the House Select Committee on China urged U.S. officials this week to cut off a broader range of exports to China, arguing that trade with China is helping to fund Beijing’s efforts to undermine American national security. Committee chair Mike Galagher, R-Wis., specifically asked witnesses from the Commerce, State and Defense Departments to enact a technology export ban on Huawei that the administration has reportedly been considering for the last year (see 2301310009).

A State Department official this week denied allegations that the agency has held back sanctions and export controls in an effort to limit damage to the U.S.-China relationship, saying the Biden administration continues to enforce a range of human rights-related trade restrictions against Beijing. But the official also said the administration hasn’t yet imposed mandatory sanctions under the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 and was accused by at least one lawmaker of failing to comply with a congressional subpoena that sought information on sanctions against China.

Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

The Biden administration should wait to place new export controls on the semiconductor industry until it adequately assesses the impact of its existing restrictions, the Semiconductor Industry Association said this week. The U.S. chip industry should be able to continue accessing the China market, SIA said, warning that “repeated steps” to “impose overly broad, ambiguous, and at times unilateral restrictions risk diminishing the U.S. semiconductor industry’s competitiveness, disrupting supply chains, causing significant market uncertainty, and prompting continued escalatory retaliation by China.”