Speakers strongly disagreed over whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires a rewrite or, as some preferred to say, an update. Representatives from the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute and Computer & Communications Industry disputed the idea that any real overhaul is necessary, while an analyst from the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation insisted a full rewrite is warranted.
Speakers strongly disagreed over whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires a rewrite or, as some preferred to say, an update. Representatives from the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute and Computer & Communications Industry disputed the idea that any real overhaul is necessary, while an analyst from the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation insisted a full rewrite is warranted.
The House Commerce Committee received 50 responses to its white paper on USF policy, the committee revealed Thursday, posting all comments online (http://1.usa.gov/1lBg6gN). It had issued the white paper in August as part of the Communications Subcommittee initiative to overhaul the Communications Act, and responses were due Sept. 19. It was the fifth white paper on aspects of the overhaul issued this year. Respondents include major companies such as AT&T and Verizon as well as state groups like NARUC and NASUCA and the tech company Microsoft, which has responded to every white paper so far. Other commenters include the Nebraska Public Service Commission, the Oregon Telecom Association and the Telecommunications Association of Maine. “We urge Congress to encourage the FCC to create an inclusive environment where all eligible providers have an opportunity to compete for support with the goal of closing the gap between broadband available in urban and rural areas,” the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association told House lawmakers. Microsoft lauded the shift in focusing USF on broadband and encouraged Congress to “continue to afford the FCC with authority and flexibility to reform the mechanism for contributing to the universal service fund, as needed.” The Alaska Communications System noted that “contrary to the prevailing view in Washington,” it “has never considered the USF system as ‘broken,'” but said it’s “vital to include safeguards that ensure that available funding is used efficiently.”
The House Commerce Committee received 50 responses to its white paper on USF policy, the committee revealed Thursday, posting all comments online (http://1.usa.gov/1lBg6gN). It had issued the white paper in August as part of the Communications Subcommittee initiative to overhaul the Communications Act, and responses were due Sept. 19. It was the fifth white paper on aspects of the overhaul issued this year. Respondents include major companies such as AT&T and Verizon as well as state groups like NARUC and NASUCA and Microsoft, which has responded to every white paper so far. Other commenters include the Nebraska Public Service Commission, the Oregon Telecom Association and the Telecommunications Association of Maine. “We urge Congress to encourage the FCC to create an inclusive environment where all eligible providers have an opportunity to compete for support with the goal of closing the gap between broadband available in urban and rural areas,” the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association told House lawmakers. Microsoft lauded the shift in focusing USF on broadband and encouraged Congress to “continue to afford the FCC with authority and flexibility to reform the mechanism for contributing to the universal service fund, as needed.” The Alaska Communications System noted that “contrary to the prevailing view in Washington,” it “has never considered the USF system as ‘broken,'” but said it’s “vital to include safeguards that ensure that available funding is used efficiently.”
An FCC order on circulation would generically ask the agency’s Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service to examine changes to USF contribution methodology without recommending how the group should proceed, said agency and industry officials in interviews this week.
An FCC order on circulation would generically ask the agency’s Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service to examine changes to USF contribution methodology without recommending how the group should proceed, said agency and industry officials in interviews this week.
A resolution urging the FCC to expand the kinds of services whose customers are required to pay into the USF (CD Feb 11 p15) was among six approved unanimously by the NARUC board at the end of the organization’s winter meeting Wednesday. The resolution, proposed by Vermont Public Service Board Commissioner John Burke, urges the FCC to expand the USF contribution base “so that all communications services, including services such as broadband that are required to be offered in order to receive federal support, contribute to USF.” The resolution took no position on whether the size of the fund should be increased. Another resolution, by Michigan Public Service Commissioner Sally Talberg, supports efforts by the FCC to allow a variety of service providers to apply for rural broadband experiments. The resolution also asked the FCC to ensure that funds for the experiments be aimed at ensuring broadband service for rural areas, and that broadband networks deployed in rural areas remain sustainable. A third resolution, by Nebraska Public Service commissioners Tim Schram and Anne Boyle, said the FCC should clarify that rules on 911 location accuracy apply to calls made from both indoors and outdoors. A resolution by Washington Utilities and Transportation Commissioner Philip Jones expressed support and encouragement to the National Association of Public Affairs Networks to establish C-SPAN-like public affairs TV networks in all 50 states. A resolution by District of Columbia Public Service Commissioner Betty Ann Kane urges the FCC to require applicants for the upcoming IP tests to prominently provide information to customers on how to submit complaints to state regulatory agencies or the FCC. Kane’s resolution also asks the FCC to require applicants requesting a waiver of a mandatory condition from the FCC to notify state regulatory commissions and customers. It also asks the FCC to provide adequate opportunity for public comment before granting a waiver.
NARUC staff approved five telecom-related resolutions Sunday. One offered by Vermont Commissioner John Burke asks the FCC to expand the USF contribution base, “so that all communications services, including services such as broadband that are required to be offered in order to receive federal support, contribute to USF.” Another by Commissioner Sally Talberg, of Michigan, supports efforts by the FCC to allow a variety of service providers to apply for rural broadband experiments. The resolution also urged the FCC to ensure the funds for the experiments not only be aimed at ensuring broadband service for rural areas, but also that broadband networks deployed in rural areas remain sustainable. A third resolution, by Nebraska Commissioners Tim Schram and Anne Boyle, asked the FCC to clarify that rules on 911 accuracy apply both indoors and outdoors. A resolution by Commissioner Philip Jones of Washington state expressed support and encouragement to the National Association of Public Affairs Networks to establish C-SPAN-like networks in all 50 states. Another resolution by South Dakota Commissioner Chris Nelson thanked Jim McConnaughey for his public service. He retired last month as NTIA chief economist.
The FCC should grant a permanent waiver of rules requiring the Oregon Public Utility Commission to provide a copy of a Lifeline subscriber’s certification form to eligible telecom carriers before that ETC can claim reimbursement from the federal USF, said the OPUC and the Oregon Telecommunications Association in a FCC petition Monday (http://bit.ly/1bSqPsA). The FCC Aug. 30 granted a limited waiver to California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Nebraska, Oregon, Utah and Vermont to allow more time for those states to implement a process to share copies of consumer eligibility certifications for Lifeline support with ETCs (http://bit.ly/1aRhRz3). The rules to require state Lifeline administrators provide subscriber certification forms to the ETCs are “unnecessary and cost prohibitive in Oregon,” said the petition. “Requiring the OPUC to provide copies of the certification forms to the ETCs does nothing to enhance the validity of the subscriber’s eligibility for Lifeline, but adds to the burden and costs to both the OPUC and the ETCs.” In turn, this will result in an “unnecessary lag” in the delivery of Lifeline benefits to eligible consumers, it said. The OPUC’s policy to verify ETC eligibility and perform checks to eliminate duplicate Lifeline benefits presents a “special case” compared to states where the ETCs are solely responsible for the same functions, said the petition. A weekly report of all Lifeline consumers approved by the OPUC is electronically transmitted to the applicant’s respective ETC, said the OPUC. This electronic notification is comparable to the certification form and it provides “sufficient safeguards” for the ETC to begin providing Lifeline benefits and apply for reimbursement from the federal USF, said the petition.
ORLANDO -- The NARUC Telecom Committee approved resolutions on federalism and surveillance at its meeting Monday. The federalism resolution approved a yearlong effort to update a paper on federalism and how the states interact with the FCC and the industry. The surveillance resolution, introduced by Indiana Utility Regulatory Commissioner Larry Landis, was also passed by the committee with major changes to reflect concern that customer proprietary network information (CPNI) restrictions are being breached by telco cooperation with the National Security Agency. All NARUC commissioners will vote on the resolutions at the closing session Wednesday.