The Bureau of Industry and Security has drafted new guidance for its October rule that expanded certain China-related chip controls (see 2210070049) and hopes to release it soon, said Thea Kendler, the agency’s assistant secretary for export administration. Kendler, speaking during a virtual conference hosted by the Massachusetts Export Center last week, also touched on the rule’s expiring temporary general license and urged industry to submit feedback on the new restrictions before the deadline this week.
The U.S. should double down on its resources, oversight and enforcement to prevent Russia from acquiring semiconductors and other dual-use goods used to power its war against Ukraine, the Silverado Policy Accelerator said in a report this week. If the broad Western export controls against Russia aren’t followed up with strict enforcement, the think tank said, Moscow will continue to find ways to import chips, including from China.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The Bureau of Industry and Security suspended the export privileges of two people for illegally exporting guns and ammunition.
Annual encryption self-classification reports and semi-annual sales reports for certain encryption items are due to the Bureau of Industry and Security by Feb. 1, Thompson Hine said in a reminder to clients last week. The self-classification report covers less sensitive items under the BIS License Exception ENC, and must provide information on encryption commodities, software and components exported during the previous calendar year. For the upcoming semi-annual sales report deadline, BIS requires information on exports that occurred between July 1 and Dec. 31 of the previous year.
The Bureau of Industry and Security is extending the public comment period for an information collection related to “miscellaneous licensing responsibilities and enforcement” (see 2211090013). The collection describes 10 miscellaneous activities associated with exporting controlled goods, including the exchanging of documents among parties in a transaction to “ensure that each party understands its obligations under U.S. law,” BIS said. Other activities involve writing export control statements on shipping documents or reporting “unforeseen changes in shipping and disposition of exported commodities.” The BIS Office of Export Enforcement and CBP need these activities to document export transactions, enforce export regulations and protect U.S. national security, BIS said. The agency is allowing for an additional 30 days of public comments. Comments had been due Jan. 9.
The top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said the Commerce Department hasn’t yet provided “acceptable responses” to oversight questions about the agency’s technology export controls. In a letter sent last week to Commerce, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said the House committee may “use the authorities available to it to enforce these requests as necessary, including through compulsory process.”
The Bureau of Industry and Security this week updated its October chip controls on China to also extend the restrictions to Macau. BIS said Macau -- as a special administrative region of China -- presents a “risk of diversion” of export controlled items and should be subject to the same license requirements introduced by BIS’ October rule, which was intended to restrict China’s ability to acquire advanced computing chips and manufacture advanced semiconductors (see 2210070049).
The Bureau of Industry and Security last week revoked the export privileges of three people for trying to illegally send items to China and Mexico.
The U.K. last week declined requests from Parliament to disclose more information about export control violations, saying it doesn’t believe the transparency will aid compliance or boost voluntary disclosures. The U.K. also said it’s bound by certain “confidentiality” requirements, including rules that limit the Department for International Trade’s Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) from releasing names of companies that have violated export restrictions.