CAFC Denies Canadian Gov't Rehearing Bid in CVD Case on Wind Towers
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Sept. 11 denied a motion for rehearing from the governments of Canada and Quebec and exporter Marmen Inc. regarding the court's decision sustaining the countervailability of a Canadian tax program. All the judges in regular active service -- Judges Kimberly Moore, Alan Lourie, Timothy Dyk, Sharon Prost, Jimmie Reyna, Richard Taranto, Raymond Chen, Todd Hughes, Kara Stoll, Tiffany Cunningham and Leonard Stark -- agreed to deny the petition (Government of Quebec v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 22-1807).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
The court sustained the countervailability of the tax program, which relates to the additional depreciation for certain Class 1 assets, in the countervailing duty investigation on utility scale wind towers from Canada (see 2406210031). The Canadian tax system allows for depreciation deductions from taxable income, and "class 1 assets" set depreciation rates for three distinct building categories. Residential buildings get a standard 4% deduction, manufacturing facilities get a 10% rate and commercial buildings get a 6% rate.
CAFC said deductions given in addition to the standard 4% rate amount to forgone revenue for the Canadian government. The Canadian government argued that the court let the Commerce Department ignore "economic reality" and elevate "form over substance" (see 2408060038).