Plaintiff Alleges Fastwyre Phoned/Texted More Than 200 Times
Fastwyre Broadband violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making telemarketing calls and sending text messages to Cathie Veres and other putative class members after they requested to no longer receive such communications, Veres’ class action alleged Thursday (docket 2:24-cv-00157)…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
in U.S. District Court for Southern Alabama in Selma. Veres did not consent to receive telemarketing calls from Fastwyre, the complaint said. The plaintiff was never a Fastwyre customer, though during fall 2023 she considered using its services, it said. Soon thereafter, she began receiving the company's telemarketing calls and text messages, it said. Between fall 2023 and May 13, when the last call arrived, Veres received more than 200 Fastwyre telemarketing calls and text messages, her complaint states. Veres sent the company multiple messages demanding that the communications cease, but to no avail, it said.