Plaintiff Alleges Roofing Telemarketer Phoned Him 18 Times Within a Week
Blue Hammer Roofing makes or causes to be made telemarketing calls to consumers to solicit business for its services, and does so in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, alleged Preston Tucker’s class action Thursday (docket 1:24-cv-01287) in U.S.…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
District Court for Colorado in Denver. Tucker personally listed his residential phone number with the national do not call registry in August 2021, yet he received 18 telemarketing calls from Blue Hammer or on its behalf between March 29 and April 5, including six calls on a single day, April 4, alleged his complaint. At no point during the relevant time period did Tucker and Blue Hammer “have a prior existing business relationship” permitting the Dallas-based residential and commercial roofing company to make telemarketing calls to the plaintiff’s residential number, it said. The Weld, Colorado, resident never consented to receiving telemarketing calls from Blue Hammer, said the complaint. The defendant or someone acting on its behalf violated Tucker’s privacy by making each of the unwanted telemarketing phone calls, “and they constitute a nuisance as they are annoying and harassing,” it said. Blue Hammer failed to honor the national DNC registrations of individuals’ residential lines while conducting telemarketing campaigns, it said.