Pa. Commissioner Claims Frontier's Settlement Lacks Deterrent
Four of five Pennsylvania public utility commissioners supported a Frontier Communications settlement Thursday that resolves a service quality complaint. The PUC approved an administrative law judge’s decision to accept without modification a pact between Frontier and state consumer and small…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
business advocates (see 2403220066). Under the settlement, Frontier agreed to spend $100 million on its Pennsylvania network through 2026 and give bill credits to customers with service problems prospectively and retroactively. Commissioner Kimberly Barrow was upset that the agreement lacked a civil penalty for Frontier. Its customers were “without access to telephone or broadband services which could impact the customer's access to education, medical or emergency services, work, and/or personal communications and interactions,” Barrow wrote. “It is well known that access to telephone and broadband services is critical to everyday life and lack of access could have a serious impact, thus the consequences of Frontier's alleged conduct should be deemed serious.” While Frontier agreed to invest $100 million in infrastructure and workforce, the carrier should have been doing that already, said Barrow: The settlement doesn’t “provide a deterrent for future behavior or punish for past behavior.” Frontier didn't comment.