9th Circuit Eyeing Oral Argument in YouTubers’ Ore. ARL Appeal vs. Google
The 9th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court is considering for August oral argument in San Francisco the appeal of three YouTubers who allege that Google violated Oregon’s Automatic Renewal Law (ARL), said a text-only docket notice Thursday (docket 23-35465). The YouTubers…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
contend that the district court erred June 15 when it granted YouTube’s motion to dismiss their second amended complaint (see 2311210030). They contend that YouTube was required under the Oregon statute to disclose, in a “clear and conspicuous manner,” five “specifically enumerated automatic renewal offer terms.” The plaintiff-appellants are three Oregon residents who enrolled in YouTube subscription services and allege that YouTube didn’t comply with any of the ARL’s requirements.