AT&T’s Answer Denies Plaintiff’s Allegations of Willful FCRA Violations
AT&T denies the allegations in plaintiff Linda Surrency’s first amended complaint that AT&T violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act when it was “plainly deficient” in its investigation of Surrency’s credit reporting dispute over identity theft after a fraudulent DirecTV account…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
was opened in her name (see 2310160035), said AT&T’s answer Friday (docket 8:23-cv-02323) in U.S. District Court for Middle Florida in Tampa. Surrency has since settled her FCRA claims against Equifax and the National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange. AT&T contends that Surrency should be suing the “proper party,” DirecTV, and it repeated that contention in Friday’s answer. AT&T asserts seven affirmative defenses, said its answer, including that any AT&T investigation of Surrency’s dispute “was reasonable and any alleged violation of the FCRA was not caused by negligence or willful conduct.” AT&T “had no duty to investigate beyond any steps it took” in response to Surrency’s dispute because AT&T “had no actual knowledge of the identity theft” alleged by Surrency and didn’t receive “sufficient information and documentation” from her “to trigger a further investigation,” it said.