Plaintiff Ordered to Show Cause Why His Case Shouldn’t Be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution
Eric Moorman has until Feb. 5 to show cause in a written response why his Telephone Consumer Protection Act complaint against Apollo Interactive shouldn’t be dismissed under Local Rule 3.10 for lack of prosecution due to his failure to file…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
a case management report within the time prescribed by that local rule. Failure to respond to the show cause order will result in Moorman’s action being dismissed without further notice, said an order signed Monday (docket 8:23-cv-01533) by U.S. District Judge Charlene Honeywell for Middle Florida in Tampa. Americans “receive billions of spam text messages every year,” and Apollo Interactive, a performance marketing and lead generation agency in Los Angeles, “is responsible for a significant portion of this spam,” alleged Moorman’s July 10 class action (see 2307110063).