Rocket Presses for Reconsideration of Court’s Denial of Its Motion to Compel
Michael Dahdah’s Dec. 22 opposition to defendant Rocket Mortgage's motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying the company’s motion to compel the plaintiff’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims to arbitration (see 2312270013) “fails to undercut” Rocket’s showing that reconsideration…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
“is warranted here,” said Rocket’s reply memorandum Monday (docket 4:22-cv-11863) in U.S. District Court for Eastern Michigan in Flint. Dahdah’s opposition “effectively concedes” that the court’s order “misapplied the law and the facts” in denying the motion to compel, said the memorandum. Dahdah’s argument rests on a “misstatement” of the court’s holding, which actually denied the motion to compel “based on finding a dispute of facts,” it said. The plaintiff also is wrong that Rocket “has somehow waived its right to arbitration,” it said.