Crown Castle Waives Right to File Response to Pasadena’s Cert Petition
Crown Castle doesn’t intend to file a response to the Dec. 26 Pasadena, Texas, cert petition unless the U.S. Supreme Court requests one, said a waiver signed Tuesday (docket 23-698) by Crown Castle’s counsel, Russell Post of Beck Redden. Pasadena’s…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
petition seeks the reversal of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmation of the district court’s judgment that Section 253 of the Telecommunications Act preempts the spacing and undergrounding requirements in the Padadena’s design manual for Crown Castle’s installation of small cells and support poles in the city’s public rights of way (see 2312300001).