Email Spam Plaintiff Ordered to Show Cause Why His Case Shouldn’t Be Dismissed
U.S. District Judge Edward Chen for Northern California in San Francisco ordered plaintiff Joel Fink to show cause by Thursday why his case against One Technologies shouldn’t be dismissed for failure to respond to the defendant’s motion to dismiss by…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
the Oct. 25 deadline, said Chen’s signed order Friday (docket 3:23-cv-05086). Failure to respond to the show cause order will result in the immediate dismissal of Fink’s case with prejudice, said the judge. Fink alleges One Technologies, a consumer credit company, sent him at least 73 unsolicited and unlawful spam emails in violation of Section 17529.5 of the California Business and Professional Code (see 2310050001)