T-Mobile’s Motion Due Nov. 10 to Compel SIM Swap Claims to Arbitration
Counsel for husband-and-wife plaintiffs Feliks Roitman and Yekaterina Shkolnik and for defendant T-Mobile jointly propose a Nov. 10 deadline for service of T-Mobile’s motion to compel the couple’s claims to arbitration and to stay the action in U.S. District Court…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
for Eastern New York in Brooklyn pending the outcome of that arbitration, T-Mobile lawyer Rebecca Tingey of Davis Wright wrote U.S. District Judge Eric Vitaliano in a letter Wednesday (docket 1:23-cv-06159). According to the jointly proposed briefing schedule, the plaintiffs’ opposition would be due Dec. 21, and T-Mobile’s reply brief in support of the motion would be due Jan. 19, said the letter. T-Mobile customers Roitman and Shkolnik allege the carrier’s “gross negligence in hiring, training, and supervising its employees” enabled a SIM card swap that let criminals steal $130,000 from their savings. They allege an unidentified person unknown to them entered a T-Mobile store in Oakland, California, in November 2021 and initiated a SIM swap on Roitman’s account, while the family was at home in Brooklyn (see 2308170015). The couple “strenuously” objects to T-Mobile’s assertions that their claims belong in arbitration rather than Brooklyn federal court (see 2310030007).