FCC Highlights National Security, Public Safety Impact of Net Neutrality
Reclassifying broadband as a Title II service would give the FCC more authority to do national security and public safety oversight, said a commission fact sheet released Thursday. "Currently, no federal agency can effectively monitor or address broadband outages that…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
threaten jobs, education, and public safety," the release said, and "while the FCC has acted on a bipartisan basis to secure our communications networks against companies controlled by hostile foreign governments, the lack of specific authority over broadband leaves open a national security loophole." The proposal would allow the agency to require providers to report and fix internet outages as it does for voice services, ensure the FCC can "deny companies controlled by hostile foreign governments access to our broadband networks," and support ongoing efforts to enhance the resiliency of broadband networks. A USTelecom spokesperson said extending Title II to "critical issues involving national security and cybersecurity is proof positive that this is a major question that must be dealt with by Congress.” Former Commissioner Mike O’Rielly, meanwhile, sees the draft NPRM, released last week, as “mostly old rhetoric.” The commission “is just going through the motions via a retread of stale arguments and disproven claims, parts seem almost lazy and unthoughtful,” O’Rielly emailed: “I am somewhat surprised by the bizarre add of [Section] 214, which brings a world of unnecessary messiness, and privacy/security, [over] which the agency has no authority left. It may be just an NPRM but biting off those issues and others while not fully closing the door to rate regulation are substantive and tactical mistakes. Overall, the text doesn't fill in the intellectual missing pieces.”