FSF Urges SCOTUS to Take Up Case to ‘Clarify the Law’ on Direct Infringement
The U.S. Supreme Court should “clarify the law” on direct infringement of copyrighted works, said Seth Cooper, Free State Foundation senior fellow and director-policy studies, in an analysis Wednesday. SCOTUS will consider at its Sept. 26 conference whether to take…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
up ABKCO Music v. Sagan (docket 22-1053), a case in which a lower court “distorted the law regarding direct copyright infringement,” said Cooper. Section 106 of the Copyright Act “secures the exclusive rights of a copyright owner to authorize the copying and distribution of creative works,” he said. But the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals “determined that a person who improperly authorizes someone else to make and distribute copies of a creative work” isn’t liable for direct infringement “if the improper authorizing person did not actually ‘press the button’ to make the copies,” he said. If left standing, the lower court's decision “would undermine the ability of copyright owners to enforce their rights in many instances,” he said. SCOTUS “should grant review and vindicate the correct understanding of direct copyright infringement,” he said.