CIT Dismisses Suit on Illegal Mexican Fish Trade, Redesignates US Counterclaim in Customs Case
The Court of International Trade granted three conservation groups' bid to dismiss a suit seeking to compel the Interior Department to respond to a request to certify Mexico had not done enough to curb illegal fishing and trade of the totoaba fish, further threatening the endangered vaquita porpoise. The conservation groups and Interior reached a settlement in April, under which the agency made the certification, which allows the president to impose restrictions on trade with Mexico.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
In a separate opinion, the trade court redesignated the government's counterclaim in a customs spat on boronized steel tubing. Judge Claire Kelly said there was no statutory basis for the U.S. to make a counterclaim in a customs case, reclassifying the government's claims as a defense. The U.S. is claiming the tubes, originally classified as duty-free U.S. goods returned after repairs, are correctly listed as steel tubes and subject to Section 301 duties.