CPUC Won’t Oppose T-Mobile’s Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings in USF Case
The California Public Utilities Commission won’t oppose T-Mobile’s May 15 motion to stay or hold in abeyance the district court’s review of the carrier’s challenge of the agency’s change to a per-line USF surcharge, pending the 9th Circuit’s resolution of…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
T-Mobile’s appeal of that change (see 2305160003), said the CPUC. It filed its statement of non-opposition Wednesday (docket 3:23-cv-00483) in U.S. District Court for Northern California in San Francisco. CPUC Assistant General Counsel Jonathan Koltz based the non-opposition on T-Mobile counsel’s assurances the carrier would comply with the surcharge until its appeals are exhausted, as it has done since the surcharge took effect April 1, said his declaration.