AT&T Risks Losing Arbitration Right if It Wades Too Deep Into Discovery, Judge Told
AT&T wants the court to stay discovery and all discovery-related deadlines, pending the resolution of AT&T’s motion to compel plaintiff Robert Graham’s claims to arbitration, said AT&T’s motion Monday (docket 1:22-cv-05155) in U.S. District Court for Northern Georgia in Atlanta.…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
AT&T says Graham agreed to a “broad arbitration provision” when he renewed his contract with AT&T in October 2018 to upgrade his phone (see 2303130002). Graham alleges AT&T’s handset upgrade exchange program was a “bait-and-switch scheme.” Graham refused AT&T requests to stay discovery, said AT&T’s Monday motion. AT&T “risks waiving its right to seek arbitration if it meaningfully participates in discovery,” it said. AT&T asked the court to grant its motion to stay discovery “not only to promote judicial economy,” but also to avoid “jeopardizing AT&T’s ability” to seek arbitration of Graham’s claims, it said. AT&T shouldn’t be required “to incur the expense of participating in judicial discovery” unless the court denies its pending arbitration motion, it said.