CAFC Denies Spanish Olive Growers' Request for More Words in Reply Brief in CVD Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a motion from plaintiff-appellants, led by Spanish olive growers Asociacion de Exportadores e Industriales de Aceitunas de Mesa, to get an additional 1,500 words to file in their reply brief…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
in a case concerning the countervailing duty investigation on the ripe olives from Spain. Judge Kara Stoll told the olive growers that their brief is not to exceed 7,000 words and is due within 21 days. The olive growers asked for the additional words due to the "complexity of the issues presented in this appeal and the fact-specific nature of the arguments raised by the other parties" (see 2304170032) (Asociacion de Exportadores e Industriales de Aceitunas de Mesa v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 23-1162).