NGSO Sunset Proposal Gets More Lobbying
Satellite operators continue to lobby on the interference protection sunset proposed in the non-geostationary orbit spectrum sharing draft order in the FCC's April agenda (see 2304120023). Amazon's Kuiper called the proposed 10-year sunset "a reasonable compromise" in docket 21-456 Friday,…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
countering arguments for a longer one. OneWeb's 15-year proposal "is far longer than necessary to secure stability for earlier-round systems," it said, saying there's no evidence that 10 years would chill investment in the satellite industry. Amazon argued previously for a six-year sunset period (see [Re:2302240062]). In a meeting with an aide to Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, OneWeb repeated its arguments for a 15-year sunset. Intelsat urged deferring the sunset issue to the Further NPRM, saying there's not strong consensus in the record. In a filing on meetings with aides to Rosenworcel, it said the agency should make clear it intends to adopt a sunset but said 10 years is unnecessarily long and there are too many questions and issues over whether the trigger should be tied to the earlier-round or later-round system. Any sunset "would penalize pioneering providers, threaten service continuity, and discourage coordination by later systems who can simply 'wait out' the sunset period," SES/O3b representatives told the commissioners and Space Bureau staffers. If the FCC opts for a sunset, 15 years would encourage operators to coordinate, it said.