Trade-Related Court Cases Filed April 3-9
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of April 3-9.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Belnick, LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its seats, metal or wood frame, qualify for Section 301 tariff exclusions. #23-00074. Filed April 3.
Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the 2020-21 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on utility scale wind towers from South Korea. #23-00075. Filed April 3.
Asociacion de Exportadores e Industriales de Aceitunas de Mesa, Agro Sevila Aceitunas S. Coop. And. and Angel Camacho Alimentacion, S.L., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the third administrative review of the countervailing duty order on ripe olives from Spain, covering entries in 2020. #23-00076. Filed April 4.
Sahamitr Pressure Container Plc., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel propane cylinders from Thailand, covering entries in 2020-21. #23-00077. Filed April 7.
Snap One, LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its network management controllers of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 8537.10.9170, dutiable at 2.7%, should be classified under subheading 8517.62.0090, free of general and Section 301 duties. #23-00078, -00079. Filed April 7.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of April 3-9.