Google Seeks Remand of ‘Dormant Clauses’ in Chrome Data Collection Case
Google seeks an order for “limited remand” to the U.S. District Court for Northern California so it may consider whether its grant of summary judgment in Google’s favor applies to the six causes of action that the court set aside…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
at the outset of the case, said its motion Friday (docket 22-16993) in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The six “dormant claims” weren’t “explicitly addressed” in the district court’s order on the 10 litigated claims and its summary judgment order closing the case, said the motion. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzales-Rogers in Oakland said she lacked jurisdiction to consider the fate of the dormant claims while the case is under appeal. The plaintiff-appellants in the appeal, all Chrome browser users alleging that Google improperly failed to disclose certain data collection practices, don’t consent to the motion for limited remand.