Intelsat, Like Bankruptcy Court, Ignoring Evidence: SES
Both the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and Intelsat are distorting the C-Band Alliance (CBA) agreement's operative text and ignoring key evidence, showing why reversal is warranted, appellant SES told the U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia in a reply brief Friday…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
(docket 3:22-cv-668). SES said it and Intelsat secured accelerated C-band relocation payments by working together, so Intelsat has no basis for keeping nearly $900 million more than SES. It said if the CBA agreement doesn't apply, then SES has a valid argument for unjust enrichment from Intelsat’s concerted efforts to deceive it about the status of what was to be a 50-50 split. SES is appealing the bankruptcy court's dismissal of its claim against Intelsat (see 2212270003). Intelsat's outside counsel didn't comment.